Skip to content
Compare Aalesund vs HamKam

Aalesund vs HamKam Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Aalesund vs HamKam: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Aalesund Aalesund Home Team
HamKam HamKam Away Team
Aalesund
39.6
D D L D L D D D W W

Last 10 Matches

HamKam
34.1
L D W L L L D D W L

Performance Radar

Aalesund
HamKam

Categories Won

7

Aalesund

4

Draw

4

HamKam

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 6D, 2L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.7

27 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
100%

10 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Christensen (6 goals)
A. Potur (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

14%

1W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.3

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 52.2

38.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.78

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.22

0.98

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
39.6

Attack: 67.5, Defense: 10.1, Form: 20.3

34.1

Attack: 35.5, Defense: 35.5, Form: 17.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

5

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
7

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

4
Aalesund
HamKam
Aalesund

Power Rating Breakdown

39.6

Overall

Attack 67.5
Defense 10.1
Form 20.3
Consistency 71.2
HamKam

Power Rating Breakdown

34.1

Overall

Attack 35.5
Defense 35.5
Form 17.8
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

52.2 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Aalesund logo Aalesund
D
Vålerenga (45%)
D
HamKam (44%)
L
Tromsø (58%)
D
Viking (59%)
L
Vålerenga (50%)
D
Molde (48%)
D
HamKam (40%)
D
Tromsø (63%)
HamKam logo HamKam
L
Brann (64%)
D
Aalesund (44%)
W
Vålerenga (50%)
L
Sarpsborg (57%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (75%)
L
Tromsø (58%)
D
Sandefjord (43%)
D
Aalesund (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Vålerenga H
5 - 5 D
45%
HamKam A
1 - 1 D
44%
Tromsø H
2 - 6 L
58%
Viking H
1 - 1 D
59%
Vålerenga A
1 - 6 L
50%
Molde H
2 - 2 D
48%
HamKam H
2 - 2 D
40%
Tromsø A
1 - 1 D
63%
Brann H
2 - 1 W
59%
Rosenborg A
3 - 2 W
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brann A
0 - 3 L
64%
Aalesund H
1 - 1 D
44%
Vålerenga A
3 - 0 W
50%
Sarpsborg A
0 - 1 L
57%
Bodø/Glimt A
0 - 3 L
75%
Tromsø H
1 - 4 L
58%
Sandefjord A
2 - 2 D
43%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Lillestrøm H
2 - 0 W
42%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 2 L
53%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Context matters here: Aalesund's schedule strength (SoS: 51.3) has been notably more demanding than HamKam's (SoS: 38.8), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Aalesund leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.0 goals per game compared to HamKam's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for HamKam — 1.8 goals conceded per game and 2 clean sheets put them well ahead of Aalesund, who give up 2.7 goals per match at the other end.

Aalesund has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Aalesund is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: HamKam is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Aalesund faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.7 goals per match. If HamKam can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Aalesund. In practical terms, Aalesund would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Aalesund, with a 5.5-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Norwegian Eliteserien (2026-08-09). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 2-2 in the Norwegian Eliteserien (2026-05-29). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Aalesund

Aalesund

VS
HamKam

HamKam

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Aalesund

2W 6D 2L · 20 goals scored · 27 conceded

HamKam

2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or