Skip to content
Compare Aalesund vs NAC

Aalesund vs NAC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Aalesund vs NAC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Aalesund Aalesund Home Team
NAC NAC Away Team
Aalesund
40.6
D D W W L D L D L D

Last 10 Matches

NAC
31.9
D W L L D D L L D L

Performance Radar

Aalesund
NAC

Categories Won

10

Aalesund

2

Draw

3

NAC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 5D, 3L

10%

1W, 4D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Lonebu (4 goals)
M. Soumano (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 48.0

54.3

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.4

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: 0.0

1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
40.6

Attack: 46.1, Defense: 42.8, Form: 19.8

31.9

Attack: 34.8, Defense: 27.8, Form: 10.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

1

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

2
Aalesund
NAC
Aalesund

Power Rating Breakdown

40.6

Overall

Attack 46.1
Defense 42.8
Form 19.8
Consistency 67.3
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.8
Defense 27.8
Form 10.4
Consistency 75.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

48.0 vs 63.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Aalesund logo Aalesund
D
HamKam (52%)
D
Tromsø (55%)
W
Brann (49%)
W
Rosenborg (44%)
L
Sandefjord (52%)
D
Kristiansund (37%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (67%)
D
KFUM (39%)
NAC logo NAC
D
AZ (68%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Utrecht (77%)
L
Ajax (68%)
D
Fortuna (56%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (56%)
L
Go Ahead (64%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
HamKam H
2 - 2 D
52%
Tromsø A
1 - 1 D
55%
Brann H
2 - 1 W
49%
Rosenborg A
3 - 2 W
44%
Sandefjord A
0 - 1 L
52%
Kristiansund H
1 - 1 D
37%
Bodø/Glimt A
0 - 3 L
67%
KFUM H
2 - 2 D
39%
Fredrikstad H
2 - 3 L
47%
Start A
1 - 1 D
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ A
3 - 3 D
68%
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
65%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
77%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
68%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
56%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
56%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
64%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
73%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 48.8 vs 54.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Aalesund holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus NAC's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Aalesund has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to NAC's 2.2.

Aalesund has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Aalesund has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.7 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Aalesund

Aalesund

VS
NAC

NAC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Aalesund

2W 5D 3L · 14 goals scored · 17 conceded

NAC

1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or