Skip to content
Compare Aberystwyth vs TNS

Aberystwyth vs TNS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Aberystwyth vs TNS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Aberystwyth Aberystwyth Home Team
TNS TNS Away Team
Aberystwyth
40.6
W W D L W L L L D

Last 10 Matches

TNS
37.4
D W L L L L W W L

Performance Radar

Aberystwyth
TNS

Categories Won

5

Aberystwyth

8

Draw

2

TNS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
33%

3W, 2D, 4L

33%

3W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

16 / 9 matches

1.8

16 / 9 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

19 / 9 matches

2.1

19 / 9 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
11%

1 / 9 matches

33%

3 / 9 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
78%

7 / 9 matches

56%

5 / 9 matches

Both Teams to Score
44%

4 / 9 matches

44%

4 / 9 matches

Top Scorer
N/A (0 goals)
N/A (0 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 16
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 16
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 44.0

37.2

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 54.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.68

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.1

1.52

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.26

Adjusted Power Rating
40.6

Attack: 56.6, Defense: 28.3, Form: 31.2

37.4

Attack: 52.3, Defense: 26.2, Form: 28.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Aberystwyth
TNS
Aberystwyth

Power Rating Breakdown

40.6

Overall

Attack 56.6
Defense 28.3
Form 31.2
Consistency 48.1
TNS

Power Rating Breakdown

37.4

Overall

Attack 52.3
Defense 26.2
Form 28.8
Consistency 43.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

44.0 vs 54.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Aberystwyth logo Aberystwyth
W
Barry Town (46%)
W
Pontypridd (21%)
D
Briton Ferry (52%)
L
Briton Ferry (47%)
W
Pontypridd (25%)
L
Barry Town (51%)
L
Cardiff City (62%)
L
TNS (45%)
TNS logo TNS
D
Cardiff City (67%)
W
Swansea (55%)
L
Wrexham (66%)
L
Wrexham (71%)
L
Swansea (50%)
L
Cardiff City (62%)
W
Pontypridd (25%)
W
Aberystwyth (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barry Town H
4 - 3 W
46%
Pontypridd H
4 - 1 W
21%
Briton Ferry A
1 - 1 D
52%
Briton Ferry H
0 - 3 L
47%
Pontypridd A
5 - 0 W
25%
Barry Town A
0 - 3 L
51%
Cardiff City H
0 - 4 L
62%
TNS A
0 - 2 L
45%
Briton Ferry H
2 - 2 D
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cardiff City A
1 - 1 D
67%
Swansea A
1 - 0 W
55%
Wrexham H
0 - 1 L
66%
Wrexham A
1 - 4 L
71%
Swansea H
2 - 5 L
50%
Cardiff City H
1 - 5 L
62%
Pontypridd A
8 - 0 W
25%
Aberystwyth H
2 - 0 W
42%
Swansea A
0 - 3 L
55%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (44.4 vs 37.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Aberystwyth averaging 1.8 and TNS averaging 1.8 goals per match.

Defensively, Aberystwyth and TNS are evenly matched, allowing 2.1 and 2.1 goals per game respectively.

Aberystwyth has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Aberystwyth faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.1 goals per match. If TNS can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Aberystwyth's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

In their recent Welsh Premier Women's League match (2026-01-25), TNS prevailed 2-0 against Aberystwyth. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. TNS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Aberystwyth will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TNS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Aberystwyth

Aberystwyth

VS
TNS

TNS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Aberystwyth

3W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 19 conceded

TNS

3W 1D 5L · 16 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or