Skip to content
Compare AGF vs OB

AGF vs OB Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AGF vs OB: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AGF AGF Home Team
OB OB Away Team
AGF
45.6
D L L L W D W D L W

Last 10 Matches

OB
38.1
D L L W L L L D L W

Performance Radar

AGF
OB

Categories Won

11

AGF

2

Draw

2

OB

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Arnstad (4 goals)
F. Arp (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
62.9

League Difficulty: 73.8, Opponent Quality: 66.8

51.9

League Difficulty: 54.0, Opponent Quality: 50.5

Elite Opponent Record
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.81

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.21

1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
45.6

Attack: 60.2, Defense: 37.6, Form: 33.9

38.1

Attack: 37.4, Defense: 47.6, Form: 20.4

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

3

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

2
AGF
OB
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

45.6

Overall

Attack 60.2
Defense 37.6
Form 33.9
Consistency 53.2
OB

Power Rating Breakdown

38.1

Overall

Attack 37.4
Defense 47.6
Form 20.4
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

73.8 vs 54.0

Opponent Quality

66.8 vs 50.5

Elite Opponent Record

40% vs 0%
AGF logo AGF
D
OB (40%)
L
Benfica (87%)
L
Viborg (55%)
L
Sabah (88%)
W
Sabah (85%)
D
Lyngby (48%)
W
Lech (91%)
D
Brøndby (48%)
OB logo OB
D
AGF (51%)
L
Horsens (46%)
L
Silkeborg (54%)
W
Sønderjyske (42%)
L
Viborg (55%)
L
Midtjylland (59%)
L
Vejle (44%)
D
Randers (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OB H
2 - 2 D
40%
Benfica A
1 - 3 L
87%
Viborg A
1 - 2 L
55%
Sabah A
0 - 4 L
88%
Sabah H
2 - 1 W
85%
Lyngby A
2 - 2 D
48%
Lech A
4 - 1 W
91%
Brøndby H
1 - 1 D
48%
Lech H
1 - 4 L
86%
Horsens H
2 - 0 W
40%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AGF A
2 - 2 D
51%
Horsens H
1 - 2 L
46%
Silkeborg A
0 - 1 L
54%
Sønderjyske H
1 - 0 W
42%
Viborg A
0 - 1 L
55%
Midtjylland A
1 - 4 L
59%
Vejle H
0 - 1 L
44%
Randers A
2 - 2 D
50%
Silkeborg H
2 - 3 L
49%
Fredericia A
2 - 0 W
55%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Context matters here: AGF's schedule strength (SoS: 62.9) has been notably more demanding than OB's (SoS: 51.9), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

AGF leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to OB's 1.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

OB has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to AGF's 2.0.

AGF has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

OB has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: OB is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, AGF faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If OB can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 69% win probability for AGF. In practical terms, AGF would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While AGF holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 7.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the Danish Superligaen (2026-08-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AGF

AGF

VS
OB

OB

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

AGF

3W 3D 4L · 16 goals scored · 20 conceded

OB

2W 2D 6L · 11 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or