Skip to content
Compare AIK vs Mjällby

AIK vs Mjällby Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AIK vs Mjällby: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AIK AIK Home Team
Mjällby Mjällby Away Team
AIK
46.9
D W W W L W D L D L

Last 10 Matches

Mjällby
50.4
L W D L D D D L W W

Performance Radar

AIK
Mjällby

Categories Won

3

AIK

3

Draw

9

Mjällby

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Filling (2 goals)
Á. Samuelsen (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.1

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 55.1

53.4

League Difficulty: 54.7, Opponent Quality: 54.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.06

1.92

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
46.9

Attack: 41.2, Defense: 58.4, Form: 41.2

50.4

Attack: 62.0, Defense: 55.1, Form: 31.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

4
AIK
Mjällby
AIK

Power Rating Breakdown

46.9

Overall

Attack 41.2
Defense 58.4
Form 41.2
Consistency 50.5
Mjällby

Power Rating Breakdown

50.4

Overall

Attack 62.0
Defense 55.1
Form 31.0
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 54.7

Opponent Quality

55.1 vs 54.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
AIK logo AIK
D
Häcken (57%)
W
GAIS (56%)
W
Mjällby (55%)
W
IFK Göteborg (41%)
L
Sirius (69%)
W
Hammarby (60%)
D
Västerås (58%)
L
Djurgården (57%)
Mjällby logo Mjällby
L
Kalmar (55%)
W
Red Imps (80%)
D
Västerås (53%)
L
AIK (49%)
D
Sirius (74%)
D
IFK Göteborg (41%)
D
Elfsborg (51%)
L
Häcken (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Häcken A
0 - 0 D
57%
GAIS H
2 - 0 W
56%
Mjällby A
2 - 1 W
55%
IFK Göteborg A
2 - 1 W
41%
Sirius H
0 - 3 L
69%
Hammarby A
2 - 1 W
60%
Västerås A
1 - 1 D
58%
Djurgården H
2 - 4 L
57%
Elfsborg A
1 - 1 D
51%
Malmö H
0 - 1 L
47%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kalmar A
1 - 2 L
55%
Red Imps H
3 - 0 W
80%
Västerås H
0 - 0 D
53%
AIK H
1 - 2 L
49%
Sirius A
4 - 4 D
74%
IFK Göteborg A
1 - 1 D
41%
Elfsborg A
1 - 1 D
51%
Häcken H
0 - 1 L
52%
Degerfors A
4 - 1 W
36%
Malmö A
3 - 2 W
52%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (53.1 vs 53.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Mjällby outperforms AIK with 1.8 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with AIK giving up 1.3 and Mjällby giving up 1.4 per fixture.

AIK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: AIK has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Mjällby faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If AIK can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Mjällby's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

In their recent Swedish Allsvenskan match (2026-07-11), AIK prevailed 1-2 against Mjällby. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, AIK achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Mjällby shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Mjällby will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. AIK will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AIK

AIK

VS
Mjällby

Mjällby

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

AIK

4W 3D 3L · 12 goals scored · 13 conceded

Mjällby

3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or