Skip to content
Compare Ettifaq vs Qadsiah

Ettifaq vs Qadsiah Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Ettifaq vs Qadsiah: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Ettifaq Ettifaq Home Team
Qadsiah Qadsiah Away Team
Ettifaq
46.2
L D D L W D W L L W

Last 10 Matches

Qadsiah
61.3
L D W W W W W D D L

Performance Radar

Ettifaq
Qadsiah

Categories Won

2

Ettifaq

2

Draw

11

Qadsiah

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+11

+11

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Dembélé (4 goals)
J. Quiñones (9 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.8

League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.7

51.2

League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 51.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.65

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.15

2.04

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
46.2

Attack: 59.3, Defense: 46.1, Form: 29.6

61.3

Attack: 70.8, Defense: 67.5, Form: 50.6

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

5
3

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

7
Ettifaq
Qadsiah
Ettifaq

Power Rating Breakdown

46.2

Overall

Attack 59.3
Defense 46.1
Form 29.6
Consistency 53.2
Qadsiah

Power Rating Breakdown

61.3

Overall

Attack 70.8
Defense 67.5
Form 50.6
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.0 vs 51.0

Opponent Quality

48.7 vs 51.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Ettifaq logo Ettifaq
L
Eldense (42%)
D
York (54%)
D
NEOM (50%)
L
Ittihad (52%)
W
Khaleej (37%)
D
Najma (33%)
W
Okhdood (34%)
L
Nassr (67%)
Qadsiah logo Qadsiah
L
Levante (57%)
D
Oviedo (40%)
W
Ittihad (57%)
W
Hazem (45%)
W
Fayha (36%)
W
Nassr (62%)
W
Riyadh (52%)
D
Shabab (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eldense A
1 - 3 L
42%
York A
2 - 2 D
54%
NEOM A
1 - 1 D
50%
Ittihad H
1 - 3 L
52%
Khaleej A
5 - 0 W
37%
Najma H
0 - 0 D
33%
Okhdood A
3 - 1 W
34%
Nassr A
0 - 1 L
67%
Riyadh H
2 - 3 L
54%
Qadsiah H
3 - 2 W
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levante A
0 - 1 L
57%
Oviedo A
0 - 0 D
40%
Ittihad A
5 - 1 W
57%
Hazem H
2 - 0 W
45%
Fayha A
2 - 1 W
36%
Nassr H
3 - 1 W
62%
Riyadh A
4 - 0 W
52%
Shabab H
2 - 2 D
50%
Damac A
1 - 1 D
57%
Ettifaq A
2 - 3 L
58%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.8 vs 51.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Qadsiah leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.1 goals per game compared to Ettifaq's 1.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Qadsiah has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Ettifaq's 1.6.

Ettifaq has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Qadsiah has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Qadsiah has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Qadsiah. In practical terms, Qadsiah would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Qadsiah in this contest. Their superior power rating of 61.3, compared to 46.2 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Saudi Arabian League match (2026-04-05), Ettifaq prevailed 3-2 against Qadsiah. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Ettifaq secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Qadsiah will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Ettifaq will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Ettifaq

Ettifaq

VS
Qadsiah

Qadsiah

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Ettifaq

3W 3D 4L · 18 goals scored · 16 conceded

Qadsiah

5W 3D 2L · 21 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or