Skip to content
Compare Ittihad vs Qadsiah

Ittihad vs Qadsiah Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Ittihad vs Qadsiah: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Ittihad Ittihad Home Team
Qadsiah Qadsiah Away Team
Ittihad
48.3
W L L W W D W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Qadsiah
68.0
D W W W W W D D L W

Performance Radar

Ittihad
Qadsiah

Categories Won

1

Ittihad

5

Draw

9

Qadsiah

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

60%

6W, 3D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+13

+13

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Y. En-Nesyri (5 goals)
J. Quiñones (9 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.8

League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

51.7

League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 50.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.85

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.05

2.39

Actual: 2.4 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
48.3

Attack: 60.5, Defense: 37.0, Form: 50.4

68.0

Attack: 81.4, Defense: 64.4, Form: 61.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

5
2

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

9
Ittihad
Qadsiah
Ittihad

Power Rating Breakdown

48.3

Overall

Attack 60.5
Defense 37.0
Form 50.4
Consistency 38.8
Qadsiah

Power Rating Breakdown

68.0

Overall

Attack 81.4
Defense 64.4
Form 61.0
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

51.0 vs 53.0

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 50.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Ittihad logo Ittihad
W
Pirates (63%)
L
Qadsiah (61%)
L
Shabab (45%)
W
Ettifaq (50%)
W
Damac (44%)
D
Al Kholood (35%)
W
Taawoun (47%)
L
NEOM (53%)
Qadsiah logo Qadsiah
D
Oviedo (42%)
W
Ittihad (52%)
W
Hazem (45%)
W
Fayha (36%)
W
Nassr (62%)
W
Riyadh (48%)
D
Shabab (48%)
D
Damac (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Pirates A
3 - 2 W
63%
Qadsiah H
1 - 5 L
61%
Shabab A
2 - 3 L
45%
Ettifaq A
3 - 1 W
50%
Damac H
2 - 1 W
44%
Al Kholood H
0 - 0 D
35%
Taawoun A
2 - 0 W
47%
NEOM H
3 - 4 L
53%
Hazem H
1 - 0 W
53%
Riyadh A
1 - 3 L
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oviedo A
0 - 0 D
42%
Ittihad A
5 - 1 W
52%
Hazem H
2 - 0 W
45%
Fayha A
2 - 1 W
36%
Nassr H
3 - 1 W
62%
Riyadh A
4 - 0 W
48%
Shabab H
2 - 2 D
48%
Damac A
1 - 1 D
57%
Ettifaq A
2 - 3 L
58%
Ahli H
3 - 2 W
60%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (50.8 vs 51.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Qadsiah outperforms Ittihad with 2.4 goals per match to 1.8, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Qadsiah's backline outperforms Ittihad's, with 1.1 goals conceded per match versus 1.9.

Ittihad has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Qadsiah has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Qadsiah has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Ittihad is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Ittihad has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Qadsiah has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.1 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 19.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Qadsiah. In practical terms, Qadsiah would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Qadsiah holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 68.0 against 48.3 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Saudi Pro League match (2026-05-21), Qadsiah prevailed 1-5 against Ittihad. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Qadsiah achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Ittihad shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 1-5 scoreline was emphatic — Qadsiah completely dominated Ittihad in that encounter, raising serious questions about Ittihad's ability to compete at this level. Ittihad will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Qadsiah will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Ittihad

Ittihad

VS
Qadsiah

Qadsiah

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Ittihad

5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 19 conceded

Qadsiah

6W 3D 1L · 24 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or