Skip to content
Compare Ittihad vs Shabab

Ittihad vs Shabab Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Ittihad vs Shabab: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Ittihad Ittihad Home Team
Shabab Shabab Away Team
Ittihad
38.5
L L W W D W L W L L

Last 10 Matches

Shabab
35.5
L W L L L D D D W D

Performance Radar

Ittihad
Shabab

Categories Won

9

Ittihad

4

Draw

2

Shabab

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Y. En-Nesyri (5 goals)
Y. Carrasco (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.5

League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 52.4

38.9

League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

1.29

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.11

Adjusted Power Rating
38.5

Attack: 47.7, Defense: 29.8, Form: 35.8

35.5

Attack: 41.5, Defense: 32.6, Form: 17.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
Ittihad
Shabab
Ittihad

Power Rating Breakdown

38.5

Overall

Attack 47.7
Defense 29.8
Form 35.8
Consistency 39.7
Shabab

Power Rating Breakdown

35.5

Overall

Attack 41.5
Defense 32.6
Form 17.8
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

53.0 vs 53.0

Opponent Quality

52.4 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Ittihad logo Ittihad
L
Qadsiah (64%)
L
Shabab (45%)
W
Ettifaq (50%)
W
Damac (44%)
D
Al Kholood (35%)
W
Taawoun (49%)
L
NEOM (53%)
W
Hazem (53%)
Shabab logo Shabab
L
Najma (38%)
W
Ittihad (42%)
L
NEOM (50%)
L
Nassr (66%)
L
Taawoun (44%)
D
Fateh (39%)
D
Qadsiah (77%)
D
Riyadh (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Qadsiah H
1 - 5 L
64%
Shabab A
2 - 3 L
45%
Ettifaq A
3 - 1 W
50%
Damac H
2 - 1 W
44%
Al Kholood H
0 - 0 D
35%
Taawoun A
2 - 0 W
49%
NEOM H
3 - 4 L
53%
Hazem H
1 - 0 W
53%
Riyadh A
1 - 3 L
56%
Ahli A
1 - 3 L
75%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Najma A
0 - 1 L
38%
Ittihad H
3 - 2 W
42%
NEOM A
1 - 2 L
50%
Nassr H
2 - 4 L
66%
Taawoun H
1 - 5 L
44%
Fateh H
1 - 1 D
39%
Qadsiah A
2 - 2 D
77%
Riyadh A
1 - 1 D
56%
Okhdood H
2 - 0 W
37%
Ettifaq A
1 - 1 D
58%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 39.5 vs 38.9), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Ittihad averaging 1.6 and Shabab averaging 1.4 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with Ittihad conceding 2.0 and Shabab conceding 1.9 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

In their recent Saudi Pro League match (2026-05-17), Shabab prevailed 3-2 against Ittihad. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Shabab secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Ittihad will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Shabab will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Ittihad

Ittihad

VS
Shabab

Shabab

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Ittihad

4W 1D 5L · 16 goals scored · 20 conceded

Shabab

2W 4D 4L · 14 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or