Ittihad vs NEOM Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Ittihad vs NEOM: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Ittihad
Home Team
NEOM
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Ittihad
Draw
NEOM
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
5W, 3D, 2L
19 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
-1
+2
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
1W / 3 matches
2W / 3 matches
4W / 7 matches
3W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: +0.11
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.1
Attack: 62.9, Defense: 33.1, Form: 49.6
Attack: 31.1, Defense: 59.4, Form: 42.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Ittihad
NEOM
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.
Ittihad has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 49.3) compared to NEOM (SoS: 34.9). This means Ittihad's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Ittihad holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus NEOM's 1.1, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
NEOM holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.9 goals per game and recording 4 clean sheets, compared to Ittihad's leaky backline that surrenders 2.0 goals per match.
Ittihad has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Ittihad has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📈 Form Momentum: NEOM has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Ittihad faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If NEOM can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: Ittihad's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Ittihad
NEOM
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Ittihad
5W 2D 3L · 19 goals scored · 20 conceded
NEOM
5W 3D 2L · 11 goals scored · 9 conceded
Popular Teams