Najma vs Hazem Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Najma vs Hazem: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Najma
Home Team
Hazem
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Najma
Draw
Hazem
Statistical Comparison
2W, 2D, 6L
4W, 2D, 4L
10 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
-12
-1
2 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
4W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 52.0
League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 49.7
0W / 2 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.1
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08
Attack: 29.8, Defense: 23.8, Form: 17.9
Attack: 40.4, Defense: 57.2, Form: 40.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Najma
Hazem
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Context matters here: Hazem's schedule strength (SoS: 51.0) has been notably more demanding than Najma's (SoS: 39.4), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
The attacking output of Najma and Hazem is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.0 and 1.2 goals per game respectively.
Hazem holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.3 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to Najma's leaky backline that surrenders 2.2 goals per match.
Hazem has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Hazem has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Najma is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Hazem faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Najma can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 16.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Hazem. In practical terms, Hazem would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Hazem emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (45.3 vs 29.1) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
These two teams drew 2-2 in the Saudi Pro League (2026-05-09). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Najma
Hazem
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Najma
2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 22 conceded
Hazem
4W 2D 4L · 12 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams