Nassr vs Ettifaq Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Nassr vs Ettifaq: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Nassr
Home Team
Ettifaq
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Nassr
Draw
Ettifaq
Statistical Comparison
7W, 1D, 2L
3W, 3D, 4L
26 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
+15
+2
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
3W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 49.9
League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.7
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.6 | Diff: +0.31
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.15
Attack: 86.9, Defense: 63.5, Form: 70.2
Attack: 59.3, Defense: 46.1, Form: 29.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Nassr
Ettifaq
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (50.3 vs 48.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Nassr leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.6 goals per game compared to Ettifaq's 1.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Nassr's backline outperforms Ettifaq's, with 1.1 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.
Nassr has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Ettifaq has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Nassr has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Nassr is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 3.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
🔥 Form Momentum: Nassr is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 26 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Nassr is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Ettifaq shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 24.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Nassr. In practical terms, Nassr would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Nassr emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (71.0 vs 46.2) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
In their recent Saudi Pro League match (2026-04-15), Nassr prevailed 1-0 against Ettifaq. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Nassr secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Ettifaq will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Nassr will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Nassr
Ettifaq
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Nassr
7W 1D 2L · 26 goals scored · 11 conceded
Ettifaq
3W 3D 4L · 18 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams