Qadsiah vs Ettifaq Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Qadsiah vs Ettifaq: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Qadsiah
Home Team
Ettifaq
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Qadsiah
Draw
Ettifaq
Statistical Comparison
5W, 3D, 2L
3W, 3D, 4L
21 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
+11
+2
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 4 matches
3W / 7 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 51.4
League Difficulty: 49.0, Opponent Quality: 48.7
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.06
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.15
Attack: 70.8, Defense: 67.5, Form: 50.6
Attack: 59.3, Defense: 46.1, Form: 29.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Qadsiah
Ettifaq
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.2 vs 48.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Qadsiah outperforms Ettifaq with 2.1 goals per match to 1.8, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Qadsiah's backline outperforms Ettifaq's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.
Qadsiah has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Ettifaq has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Qadsiah has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 15.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Qadsiah. In practical terms, Qadsiah would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Qadsiah emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (61.3 vs 46.2) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
In their recent Saudi Arabian League match (2026-04-05), Ettifaq prevailed 3-2 against Qadsiah. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Ettifaq secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Qadsiah will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Ettifaq will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Qadsiah
Ettifaq
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Qadsiah
5W 3D 2L · 21 goals scored · 10 conceded
Ettifaq
3W 3D 4L · 18 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams