Qadsiah vs Hazem Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Qadsiah vs Hazem: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Qadsiah
Home Team
Hazem
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Qadsiah
Draw
Hazem
Statistical Comparison
5W, 3D, 2L
4W, 2D, 4L
21 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
+11
-1
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
4W / 5 matches
3W / 7 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 51.4
League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 49.7
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.06
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.08
Attack: 70.8, Defense: 67.5, Form: 50.6
Attack: 40.4, Defense: 57.2, Form: 40.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Qadsiah
Hazem
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (51.2 vs 51.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Qadsiah leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.1 goals per game compared to Hazem's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Qadsiah's backline outperforms Hazem's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.3.
Qadsiah has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Hazem has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Hazem has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Qadsiah has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 16.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Qadsiah. In practical terms, Qadsiah would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Qadsiah holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 61.3 against 45.3 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
In their recent Saudi Pro League match (2026-05-14), Qadsiah prevailed 2-0 against Hazem. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Qadsiah secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Hazem will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Qadsiah will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Qadsiah
Hazem
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Qadsiah
5W 3D 2L · 21 goals scored · 10 conceded
Hazem
4W 2D 4L · 12 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams