Qadsiah vs Nassr Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Qadsiah vs Nassr: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Qadsiah
Home Team
Nassr
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Qadsiah
Draw
Nassr
Statistical Comparison
5W, 3D, 2L
7W, 1D, 2L
21 / 10 matches
26 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
+11
+15
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
4W / 5 matches
3W / 7 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 51.4
League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 49.9
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.06
Actual: 2.6 | Diff: +0.31
Attack: 70.8, Defense: 67.5, Form: 50.6
Attack: 86.9, Defense: 63.5, Form: 70.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Qadsiah
Nassr
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (51.2 vs 50.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Nassr holds the attacking edge with 2.6 goals per match versus Qadsiah's 2.1, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Qadsiah giving up 1.0 and Nassr giving up 1.1 per fixture.
Qadsiah has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Nassr has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Nassr has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Nassr is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: Qadsiah has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
🔥 Form Momentum: Nassr is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 26 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
💡 Why This Matters: The 9.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 74% win probability for Nassr. In practical terms, Nassr would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
While Nassr holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 9.7-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
In their recent Saudi Pro League match (2026-05-03), Qadsiah prevailed 3-1 against Nassr. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Qadsiah secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Nassr will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Qadsiah will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Qadsiah
Nassr
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Qadsiah
5W 3D 2L · 21 goals scored · 10 conceded
Nassr
7W 1D 2L · 26 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams