Alfreton vs Curzon Ashton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Alfreton vs Curzon Ashton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Alfreton
Home Team
Curzon Ashton
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Alfreton
Draw
Curzon Ashton
Statistical Comparison
2W, 4D, 4L
1W, 4D, 5L
13 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
-6
-11
0 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
0W / 8 matches
0W / 5 matches
2W / 2 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 36.0, Opponent Quality: 43.6
League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.3
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.18
Attack: 39.3, Defense: 33.2, Form: 18.1
Attack: 29.1, Defense: 26.2, Form: 8.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Alfreton
Curzon Ashton
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (40.6 vs 37.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Offensively, Alfreton outperforms Curzon Ashton with 1.3 goals per match to 1.0, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Alfreton giving up 1.9 and Curzon Ashton giving up 2.1 per fixture.
Alfreton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Curzon Ashton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Alfreton is a strong road performer with a 100% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.2 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Alfreton is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Curzon Ashton is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Alfreton faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.9 goals per match. If Curzon Ashton can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Alfreton. In practical terms, Alfreton would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Alfreton, with a 5.8-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
These two teams drew 3-3 in the National League N / S (2026-04-25). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Alfreton
Curzon Ashton
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Alfreton
2W 4D 4L · 13 goals scored · 19 conceded
Curzon Ashton
1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams