Skip to content
Compare Alfreton vs Merthyr

Alfreton vs Merthyr Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Alfreton vs Merthyr: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Alfreton Alfreton Home Team
Merthyr Merthyr Away Team
Alfreton
40.3
L L L D W D D W D W

Last 10 Matches

Merthyr
34.8
W L D L L W L L D L

Performance Radar

Alfreton
Merthyr

Categories Won

5

Alfreton

4

Draw

6

Merthyr

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Ligendza (3 goals)
C. Cox (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
12%

1W / 8 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
100%

2W / 2 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.1

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 42.1

40.9

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.28

1.42

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
40.3

Attack: 41.6, Defense: 44.5, Form: 26.7

34.8

Attack: 45.5, Defense: 27.3, Form: 18.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

4

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

2
Alfreton
Merthyr
Alfreton

Power Rating Breakdown

40.3

Overall

Attack 41.6
Defense 44.5
Form 26.7
Consistency 57.7
Merthyr

Power Rating Breakdown

34.8

Overall

Attack 45.5
Defense 27.3
Form 18.2
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

34.5 vs 34.5

Opponent Quality

42.1 vs 45.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Alfreton logo Alfreton
L
Rotherham (37%)
L
Derby (51%)
L
Boston (52%)
D
Curzon Ashton (27%)
W
Marine (37%)
D
Buxton (55%)
D
Oxford City (53%)
W
Leamington (31%)
Merthyr logo Merthyr
W
Briton Ferry Llansawel (50%)
L
Forest Green (53%)
D
Yeovil (35%)
L
Fylde (46%)
L
Scarborough (46%)
W
Marine (37%)
L
Macclesfield (39%)
L
Hereford (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Rotherham H
0 - 1 L
37%
Derby H
0 - 2 L
51%
Boston H
1 - 2 L
52%
Curzon Ashton H
3 - 3 D
27%
Marine A
3 - 2 W
37%
Buxton H
2 - 2 D
55%
Oxford City H
1 - 1 D
53%
Leamington A
2 - 1 W
31%
Worksop H
1 - 1 D
46%
Chorley H
1 - 0 W
32%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Briton Ferry Llansawel H
3 - 0 W
50%
Forest Green H
1 - 2 L
53%
Yeovil H
2 - 2 D
35%
Fylde H
2 - 4 L
46%
Scarborough A
1 - 2 L
46%
Marine A
3 - 1 W
37%
Macclesfield H
1 - 2 L
39%
Hereford A
0 - 3 L
45%
Oxford City H
1 - 1 D
53%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (39.1 vs 40.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of Alfreton and Merthyr is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.4 and 1.5 goals per game respectively.

Alfreton's backline outperforms Merthyr's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.1.

Alfreton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Merthyr has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Alfreton is a strong road performer with a 100% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Merthyr is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Alfreton faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Merthyr can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Alfreton. In practical terms, Alfreton would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

While Alfreton holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 5.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Alfreton

Alfreton

VS
Merthyr

Merthyr

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Alfreton

3W 4D 3L · 14 goals scored · 15 conceded

Merthyr

2W 2D 6L · 15 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or