Skip to content
Compare Austin vs Minnesota

Austin vs Minnesota Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Austin vs Minnesota: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Austin Austin Home Team
Minnesota Minnesota Away Team
Austin
30.1
D W L L L W L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Minnesota
42.0
W L D D D L D L L D

Performance Radar

Austin
Minnesota

Categories Won

3

Austin

2

Draw

10

Minnesota

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

10%

1W, 5D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

0

0

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Uzuni (2 goals)
K. Yeboah (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.8

50.7

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.95

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.05

1.35

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
30.1

Attack: 30.0, Defense: 27.0, Form: 18.0

42.0

Attack: 43.6, Defense: 57.1, Form: 10.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Austin
Minnesota
Austin

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 30.0
Defense 27.0
Form 18.0
Consistency 59.2
Minnesota

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 43.6
Defense 57.1
Form 10.1
Consistency 77.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

51.8 vs 47.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Austin logo Austin
D
Philadelphia (52%)
W
Sounders (36%)
L
Dallas (53%)
L
Colorado (54%)
L
Houston (70%)
W
Sounders (31%)
L
St. Louis (72%)
L
Sporting KC (41%)
Minnesota logo Minnesota
W
Earthquakes (38%)
L
Atlanta United (44%)
D
Salt Lake (54%)
D
San Diego (54%)
D
Whitecaps (55%)
L
Sporting KC (46%)
D
Salt Lake (49%)
L
New England (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Philadelphia H
1 - 1 D
52%
Sounders A
2 - 1 W
36%
Dallas H
1 - 2 L
53%
Colorado A
0 - 1 L
54%
Houston A
0 - 3 L
70%
Sounders H
3 - 1 W
31%
St. Louis A
0 - 3 L
72%
Sporting KC H
1 - 2 L
41%
San Diego A
0 - 5 L
59%
Minnesota A
2 - 2 D
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Earthquakes A
5 - 1 W
38%
Atlanta United H
1 - 2 L
44%
Salt Lake A
1 - 1 D
54%
San Diego H
1 - 1 D
54%
Whitecaps H
0 - 0 D
55%
Sporting KC A
1 - 2 L
46%
Salt Lake H
1 - 1 D
49%
New England A
1 - 2 L
53%
Colorado H
0 - 1 L
49%
Austin H
2 - 2 D
37%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Minnesota has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 50.7) compared to Austin (SoS: 40.1). This means Minnesota's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.

Minnesota holds the attacking edge with 1.3 goals per match versus Austin's 1.0, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Minnesota holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.3 goals per game and recording 1 clean sheets, compared to Austin's leaky backline that surrenders 2.1 goals per match.

Minnesota has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Austin is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Minnesota is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Minnesota faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Austin can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for Minnesota. In practical terms, Minnesota would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Minnesota, with a 11.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the US Major League Soccer (2026-05-11). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Austin

Austin

VS
Minnesota

Minnesota

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Austin

2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded

Minnesota

1W 5D 4L · 13 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or