Skip to content
Compare Austria vs Finland

Austria vs Finland Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Austria vs Finland: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Austria Austria Home Team
Finland Finland Away Team
Austria
36.7
L W D L L L L D W L

Last 10 Matches

Finland
46.2
W W W W W L D D L L

Performance Radar

Austria
Finland

Categories Won

3

Austria

2

Draw

10

Finland

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Y. Kotyk (1 goals)
L. Lindström (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.7

League Difficulty: 52.0, Opponent Quality: 51.5

38.1

League Difficulty: 52.0, Opponent Quality: 49.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.68

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12

1.85

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
36.7

Attack: 27.1, Defense: 54.2, Form: 20.3

46.2

Attack: 52.9, Defense: 41.1, Form: 44.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

6
2

76-90+'

2
Austria
Finland
Austria

Power Rating Breakdown

36.7

Overall

Attack 27.1
Defense 54.2
Form 20.3
Consistency 59.2
Finland

Power Rating Breakdown

46.2

Overall

Attack 52.9
Defense 41.1
Form 44.0
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

52.0 vs 52.0

Opponent Quality

51.5 vs 49.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Austria logo Austria
L
Norway (58%)
W
Slovenia (24%)
D
Germany (62%)
L
Germany (67%)
L
Slovenia (29%)
L
Norway (53%)
L
Ukraine (50%)
D
Finland (69%)
Finland logo Finland
W
Portugal (52%)
W
Slovakia (40%)
W
Latvia (29%)
W
Slovakia (35%)
W
Latvia (25%)
L
Portugal (57%)
D
Belgium (84%)
D
Austria (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Norway A
1 - 2 L
58%
Slovenia H
1 - 0 W
24%
Germany H
0 - 0 D
62%
Germany A
1 - 5 L
67%
Slovenia A
0 - 1 L
29%
Norway H
0 - 1 L
53%
Ukraine A
2 - 3 L
50%
Finland A
1 - 1 D
69%
Czech Republic H
2 - 0 W
49%
Czech Republic A
0 - 1 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Portugal H
3 - 1 W
52%
Slovakia A
4 - 0 W
40%
Latvia A
1 - 0 W
29%
Slovakia H
4 - 2 W
35%
Latvia H
3 - 1 W
25%
Portugal A
0 - 2 L
57%
Belgium A
1 - 1 D
84%
Austria H
1 - 1 D
50%
Denmark A
0 - 2 L
64%
Denmark H
1 - 6 L
59%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Context matters here: Austria's schedule strength (SoS: 51.7) has been notably more demanding than Finland's (SoS: 38.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Finland possess a formidable attacking unit, with L. Lindström accounting for 4 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 1.8 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Both defenses are comparable, with Austria conceding 1.4 and Finland conceding 1.6 per match.

Austria has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Austria is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Finland has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Finland is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Austria shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Finland faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Austria can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 74% win probability for Finland. In practical terms, Finland would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Finland holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 9.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Internationals Women (2025-11-27). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Austria

Austria

VS
Finland

Finland

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Austria

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 14 conceded

Finland

5W 2D 3L · 18 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or