Skip to content
Compare AZ vs Fortuna

AZ vs Fortuna Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs Fortuna: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ AZ Home Team
Fortuna Fortuna Away Team
AZ
51.3
W W D D D D D D W L

Last 10 Matches

Fortuna
34.0
L L L W L L D L L W

Performance Radar

AZ
Fortuna

Categories Won

9

AZ

3

Draw

3

Fortuna

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 6D, 1L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-9

-9

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Mijnans (3 goals)
K. Sierhuis (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.2

League Difficulty: 69.1, Opponent Quality: 61.6

50.1

League Difficulty: 73.0, Opponent Quality: 59.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.08

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.18

1.24

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
51.3

Attack: 62.8, Defense: 52.9, Form: 29.8

34.0

Attack: 36.7, Defense: 33.4, Form: 20.0

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

2

16-30'

2

31-45'

1

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

AZ
Fortuna
AZ

Power Rating Breakdown

51.3

Overall

Attack 62.8
Defense 52.9
Form 29.8
Consistency 68.5
Fortuna

Power Rating Breakdown

34.0

Overall

Attack 36.7
Defense 33.4
Form 20.0
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

69.1 vs 73.0

Opponent Quality

61.6 vs 59.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
AZ logo AZ
W
Olympiakos (41%)
W
Genk (45%)
D
ZW (66%)
D
NAC (50%)
D
Feyenoord (78%)
D
Twente (62%)
D
Go Ahead (66%)
D
Shakhtar D (70%)
Fortuna logo Fortuna
L
Metz (50%)
L
Olympiakos (41%)
L
Utrecht (71%)
W
Zwolle (48%)
L
Feyenoord (73%)
L
Heerenveen (68%)
D
NAC (50%)
L
AZ (71%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Olympiakos H
3 - 2 W
41%
Genk H
4 - 0 W
45%
ZW A
1 - 1 D
66%
NAC H
3 - 3 D
50%
Feyenoord A
1 - 1 D
78%
Twente H
2 - 2 D
62%
Go Ahead A
0 - 0 D
66%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
70%
Heerenveen H
3 - 0 W
63%
Shakhtar D A
0 - 3 L
75%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Metz A
1 - 3 L
50%
Olympiakos H
1 - 3 L
41%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
71%
Zwolle H
3 - 2 W
48%
Feyenoord H
1 - 2 L
73%
Heerenveen A
1 - 2 L
68%
NAC H
1 - 1 D
50%
AZ A
0 - 2 L
71%
Twente H
1 - 2 L
62%
Volendam A
2 - 1 W
62%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (49.2 vs 50.1), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, AZ outperforms Fortuna with 1.9 goals per match to 1.1, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

AZ's backline outperforms Fortuna's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Fortuna has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.2 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Fortuna is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, AZ faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Fortuna can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 17.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for AZ. In practical terms, AZ would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward AZ in this contest. Their superior power rating of 51.3, compared to 34.0 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-04-04), AZ prevailed 2-0 against Fortuna. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. AZ secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Fortuna will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. AZ will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AZ

AZ

VS
Fortuna

Fortuna

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

AZ

3W 6D 1L · 19 goals scored · 14 conceded

Fortuna

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or