Skip to content
Compare AZ vs Jaro

AZ vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare AZ vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

AZ AZ Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
AZ
52.3
D D D D D W L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
27.8
W L D L L L W L L L

Performance Radar

AZ
Jaro

Categories Won

11

AZ

1

Draw

3

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.7

27 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Mijnans (5 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
59.0

League Difficulty: 79.4, Opponent Quality: 65.7

48.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.94

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.24

1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
52.3

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 58.1, Form: 32.7

27.8

Attack: 36.1, Defense: 9.8, Form: 19.7

Goal Timing Analysis

9

0-15'

2

16-30'

4

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

3

76-90+'

1
AZ
Jaro
AZ

Power Rating Breakdown

52.3

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 58.1
Form 32.7
Consistency 62.8
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

27.8

Overall

Attack 36.1
Defense 9.8
Form 19.7
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

79.4 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

65.7 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

17% vs 0%
AZ logo AZ
D
NAC (47%)
D
Feyenoord (72%)
D
Twente (70%)
D
Go Ahead (64%)
D
Shakhtar D (70%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Shakhtar D (75%)
W
Fortuna (51%)
Jaro logo Jaro
W
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
D
Gnistan (56%)
L
Ilves (51%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
KuPS (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
NAC H
3 - 3 D
47%
Feyenoord A
1 - 1 D
72%
Twente H
2 - 2 D
70%
Go Ahead A
0 - 0 D
64%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 2 D
70%
Heerenveen H
3 - 0 W
65%
Shakhtar D A
0 - 3 L
75%
Fortuna H
2 - 0 W
51%
Groningen A
0 - 3 L
70%
Sparta Prague A
4 - 0 W
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
46%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
51%
HJK H
2 - 5 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
22%
KuPS A
0 - 3 L
62%
Gnistan A
0 - 5 L
60%
Inter Turku A
0 - 2 L
61%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

AZ has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 59.0) compared to Jaro (SoS: 48.4). This means AZ's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

AZ holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Jaro's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, AZ is far superior, conceding just 1.4 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.7 per match.

AZ has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

AZ emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (52.3 vs 27.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

AZ

AZ

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

AZ

3W 5D 2L · 17 goals scored · 14 conceded

Jaro

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 27 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or