Skip to content
Compare Bath vs Dorking

Bath vs Dorking Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Bath vs Dorking: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Bath Bath Home Team
Dorking Dorking Away Team
Bath
36.1
D L L W L W L W L D

Last 10 Matches

Dorking
36.1
W L W D L L L L W D

Performance Radar

Bath
Dorking

Categories Won

6

Bath

5

Draw

4

Dorking

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Wilson (4 goals)
P. McCallum (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.6

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

39.2

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 44.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.4

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2

1.26

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
36.1

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2

36.1

Attack: 41.6, Defense: 32.7, Form: 26.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

4
Bath
Dorking
Bath

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 24.2
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3
Dorking

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 41.6
Defense 32.7
Form 26.8
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

33.0 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

45.7 vs 44.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Bath logo Bath
D
Newport (45%)
L
Plymouth (62%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
W
Dorking (39%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Chesham (43%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Chippenham (38%)
Dorking logo Dorking
W
Lewes (46%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
L
Bath (33%)
L
Totton (43%)
L
Worthing (54%)
L
Horsham (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
2 - 2 D
45%
Plymouth H
0 - 3 L
62%
Maidstone H
2 - 3 L
57%
Dorking A
3 - 1 W
39%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham H
4 - 2 W
43%
Torquay A
1 - 4 L
53%
Chippenham H
1 - 0 W
38%
Maidenhead A
0 - 3 L
48%
Eastbourne A
2 - 2 D
29%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lewes A
2 - 1 W
46%
Torquay A
2 - 4 L
53%
Maidenhead H
2 - 0 W
43%
Weston-s-Mare A
1 - 1 D
40%
Bath H
1 - 3 L
33%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Worthing H
1 - 2 L
54%
Horsham A
0 - 3 L
38%
Hemel H H
2 - 1 W
40%
Torquay A
2 - 2 D
53%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (40.6 vs 39.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Bath (1.6 goals per match) and Dorking (1.4 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Dorking's backline outperforms Bath's, with 1.9 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.

Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Dorking has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Bath's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-18), Bath prevailed 1-3 against Dorking. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Bath achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Dorking shows genuine quality and mental strength. Dorking will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Bath will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Bath

Bath

VS
Dorking

Dorking

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Bath

3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded

Dorking

3W 2D 5L · 14 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or