Bath vs Salisbury Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Bath vs Salisbury: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Bath
Home Team
Salisbury
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Bath
Draw
Salisbury
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
4W, 2D, 4L
16 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-6
+2
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
4W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7
League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 36.0
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.38
Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2
Attack: 47.4, Defense: 41.8, Form: 33.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Bath
Salisbury
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (40.6 vs 33.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Bath (1.6 goals per match) and Salisbury (1.7 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Salisbury's backline outperforms Bath's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.
Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Salisbury has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Salisbury has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Salisbury faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Bath can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Salisbury. In practical terms, Salisbury would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
Salisbury has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Bath
Salisbury
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Bath
3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded
Salisbury
4W 2D 4L · 17 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams