Skip to content
Compare Bath vs Salisbury

Bath vs Salisbury Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Bath vs Salisbury: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Bath Bath Home Team
Salisbury Salisbury Away Team
Bath
36.1
D L L W L W L W L D

Last 10 Matches

Salisbury
41.4
D W L L L W W D L W

Performance Radar

Bath
Salisbury

Categories Won

4

Bath

2

Draw

9

Salisbury

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Wilson (4 goals)
N. Odokonyero (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.6

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

33.6

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 36.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.4

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2

1.32

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.38

Adjusted Power Rating
36.1

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2

41.4

Attack: 47.4, Defense: 41.8, Form: 33.4

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
Bath
Salisbury
Bath

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 24.2
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3
Salisbury

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 47.4
Defense 41.8
Form 33.4
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

33.0 vs 30.0

Opponent Quality

45.7 vs 36.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Bath logo Bath
D
Newport (45%)
L
Plymouth (62%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
W
Dorking (39%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Chesham (43%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Chippenham (38%)
Salisbury logo Salisbury
D
Hemel H (45%)
W
Horsham (33%)
L
Tonbridge (47%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (36%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Dover (20%)
W
Enfield T (33%)
D
Slough (26%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
2 - 2 D
45%
Plymouth H
0 - 3 L
62%
Maidstone H
2 - 3 L
57%
Dorking A
3 - 1 W
39%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham H
4 - 2 W
43%
Torquay A
1 - 4 L
53%
Chippenham H
1 - 0 W
38%
Maidenhead A
0 - 3 L
48%
Eastbourne A
2 - 2 D
29%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hemel H A
1 - 1 D
45%
Horsham H
2 - 1 W
33%
Tonbridge A
2 - 3 L
47%
Weston-s-Mare H
1 - 2 L
36%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Dover H
2 - 1 W
20%
Enfield T H
2 - 0 W
33%
Slough A
3 - 3 D
26%
Torquay A
1 - 2 L
53%
Eastbourne H
2 - 0 W
24%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (40.6 vs 33.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Bath (1.6 goals per match) and Salisbury (1.7 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Salisbury's backline outperforms Bath's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.

Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Salisbury has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Salisbury has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Salisbury faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Bath can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Salisbury. In practical terms, Salisbury would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

Salisbury has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Bath

Bath

VS
Salisbury

Salisbury

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Bath

3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded

Salisbury

4W 2D 4L · 17 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or