Skip to content
Compare Birmingham vs Charlton

Birmingham vs Charlton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Birmingham vs Charlton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Birmingham Birmingham Home Team
Charlton Charlton Away Team
Birmingham
54.9
W W L D W W D W L L

Last 10 Matches

Charlton
38.3
L W L W L D L D L L

Performance Radar

Birmingham
Charlton

Categories Won

10

Birmingham

5

Draw

0

Charlton

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Carlos Vicente (2 goals)
M. Godden (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.5

League Difficulty: 59.0, Opponent Quality: 56.5

57.0

League Difficulty: 61.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.44

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.14

1.0

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
54.9

Attack: 46.6, Defense: 71.7, Form: 53.8

38.3

Attack: 32.1, Defense: 53.5, Form: 21.4

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Birmingham
Charlton
Birmingham

Power Rating Breakdown

54.9

Overall

Attack 46.6
Defense 71.7
Form 53.8
Consistency 45.7
Charlton

Power Rating Breakdown

38.3

Overall

Attack 32.1
Defense 53.5
Form 21.4
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.0 vs 61.0

Opponent Quality

56.5 vs 54.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Birmingham logo Birmingham
W
Crewe (46%)
W
Burton (49%)
L
Porto (55%)
D
Portsmouth (62%)
W
Bristol C (56%)
W
Preston (54%)
D
Hull (65%)
W
Wrexham (56%)
Charlton logo Charlton
L
Wimbledon (41%)
W
Gillingham (50%)
L
Swansea (63%)
W
Hull (60%)
L
Ipswich (64%)
D
Sheff Wed (47%)
L
Preston (54%)
D
Watford (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Crewe A
2 - 1 W
46%
Burton A
1 - 0 W
49%
Porto H
1 - 2 L
55%
Portsmouth A
1 - 1 D
62%
Bristol C H
2 - 1 W
56%
Preston H
2 - 1 W
54%
Hull A
1 - 1 D
65%
Wrexham H
2 - 0 W
56%
Ipswich A
1 - 2 L
69%
Blackburn H
0 - 1 L
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Wimbledon A
0 - 2 L
41%
Gillingham A
1 - 0 W
50%
Swansea A
1 - 3 L
63%
Hull H
2 - 1 W
60%
Ipswich H
1 - 2 L
64%
Sheff Wed A
1 - 1 D
47%
Preston H
1 - 2 L
54%
Watford A
1 - 1 D
46%
Bristol C H
1 - 2 L
56%
Norwich H
0 - 1 L
62%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.5 vs 57.0), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Offensively, Birmingham outperforms Charlton with 1.3 goals per match to 0.9, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Birmingham has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Charlton's 1.5.

Birmingham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Charlton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Birmingham has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Charlton is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Birmingham is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Charlton shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 16.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Birmingham. In practical terms, Birmingham would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Birmingham holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 54.9 against 38.3 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Birmingham

Birmingham

VS
Charlton

Charlton

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Birmingham

5W 2D 3L · 13 goals scored · 10 conceded

Charlton

2W 2D 6L · 9 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or