Birmingham vs Charlton Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Birmingham vs Charlton: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Birmingham
Home Team
Charlton
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Birmingham
Draw
Charlton
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
2W, 2D, 6L
13 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
+3
-6
2 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 59.0, Opponent Quality: 56.5
League Difficulty: 61.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.14
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.1
Attack: 46.6, Defense: 71.7, Form: 53.8
Attack: 32.1, Defense: 53.5, Form: 21.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Birmingham
Charlton
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.5 vs 57.0), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Birmingham outperforms Charlton with 1.3 goals per match to 0.9, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Birmingham has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Charlton's 1.5.
Birmingham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Charlton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.3 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Birmingham has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Charlton is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Birmingham is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Charlton shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 16.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Birmingham. In practical terms, Birmingham would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Birmingham holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 54.9 against 38.3 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Birmingham
Charlton
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Birmingham
5W 2D 3L · 13 goals scored · 10 conceded
Charlton
2W 2D 6L · 9 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams