Skip to content
Compare Boston vs Rochdale

Boston vs Rochdale Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Boston vs Rochdale: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Boston Boston Home Team
Rochdale Rochdale Away Team
Boston
49.5
W W W W D W D L D L

Last 10 Matches

Rochdale
41.9
D D L D W D W W D L

Performance Radar

Boston
Rochdale

Categories Won

8

Boston

4

Draw

3

Rochdale

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 3D, 2L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
F. Maguire (3 goals)
E. Dieseruvwe (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.0

League Difficulty: 37.0, Opponent Quality: 45.4

40.6

League Difficulty: 38.0, Opponent Quality: 42.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.42

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.18

1.47

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
49.5

Attack: 49.1, Defense: 52.1, Form: 46.0

41.9

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 39.3, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

7

76-90+'

7
Boston
Rochdale
Boston

Power Rating Breakdown

49.5

Overall

Attack 49.1
Defense 52.1
Form 46.0
Consistency 53.2
Rochdale

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 39.3
Form 27.2
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

37.0 vs 38.0

Opponent Quality

45.4 vs 42.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Boston logo Boston
W
Peterborough (37%)
W
Alfreton (50%)
W
Hartlepool (44%)
W
Solihull (56%)
D
Wealdstone (44%)
W
Truro (41%)
D
Brackley (34%)
L
York (45%)
Rochdale logo Rochdale
D
Farnham (45%)
D
Rayyan (45%)
L
Utd Manchester (40%)
D
Boreham Wood (65%)
W
Scunthorpe (38%)
D
York (45%)
W
Braintree (28%)
W
Wealdstone (39%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Peterborough H
1 - 0 W
37%
Alfreton A
2 - 1 W
50%
Hartlepool H
3 - 1 W
44%
Solihull A
3 - 0 W
56%
Wealdstone A
1 - 1 D
44%
Truro H
1 - 0 W
41%
Brackley A
1 - 1 D
34%
York H
0 - 1 L
45%
Altrincham H
2 - 2 D
39%
Carlisle A
2 - 6 L
64%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Farnham H
2 - 2 D
45%
Rayyan H
3 - 3 D
45%
Utd Manchester A
0 - 2 L
40%
Boreham Wood A
2 - 2 D
65%
Scunthorpe H
2 - 1 W
38%
York H
1 - 1 D
45%
Braintree A
2 - 1 W
28%
Wealdstone H
2 - 1 W
39%
Hartlepool A
0 - 0 D
49%
Morecambe H
2 - 4 L
30%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (42.0 vs 40.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Boston (1.6 goals per match) and Rochdale (1.6 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Boston has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Rochdale's 1.7.

Boston has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Rochdale has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Boston has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 69% win probability for Boston. In practical terms, Boston would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Boston has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.6-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Boston

Boston

VS
Rochdale

Rochdale

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Boston

5W 3D 2L · 16 goals scored · 13 conceded

Rochdale

3W 5D 2L · 16 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or