Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Bologna

Brann vs Bologna Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Bologna: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Bologna Bologna Away Team
Brann
62.4
D W W L W W L D W W

Last 10 Matches

Bologna
56.4
L W W W D L D W W D

Performance Radar

Brann
Bologna

Categories Won

9

Brann

1

Draw

5

Bologna

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Castro (5 goals)
R. Orsolini (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.3

League Difficulty: 64.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3

57.2

League Difficulty: 63.0, Opponent Quality: 55.7

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.46

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.26

1.66

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
62.4

Attack: 75.0, Defense: 54.6, Form: 61.4

56.4

Attack: 57.2, Defense: 60.7, Form: 53.6

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

1
5

61-75'

7

76-90+'

2
Brann
Bologna
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

62.4

Overall

Attack 75.0
Defense 54.6
Form 61.4
Consistency 52.0
Bologna

Power Rating Breakdown

56.4

Overall

Attack 57.2
Defense 60.7
Form 53.6
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

64.0 vs 63.0

Opponent Quality

58.3 vs 55.7

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 50%
Brann logo Brann
D
PAOK (71%)
W
HamKam (40%)
W
Apollon (77%)
L
Apollon (75%)
W
Rosenborg (51%)
W
U Cluj (68%)
L
Vålerenga (45%)
D
U Cluj (70%)
Bologna logo Bologna
L
Brighton (57%)
W
Cambuur (28%)
W
Cambuur (28%)
W
Iraklis 1908 (39%)
D
Heidenheim (49%)
L
Bielefeld (51%)
D
Inter Milan (80%)
W
Atalanta (72%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PAOK A
1 - 1 D
71%
HamKam H
3 - 0 W
40%
Apollon A
4 - 2 W
77%
Apollon H
0 - 1 L
75%
Rosenborg H
3 - 2 W
51%
U Cluj H
3 - 1 W
68%
Vålerenga H
2 - 3 L
45%
U Cluj A
2 - 2 D
70%
Molde A
2 - 1 W
53%
Start H
2 - 1 W
33%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brighton A
0 - 1 L
57%
Cambuur H
3 - 1 W
28%
Cambuur H
3 - 1 W
28%
Iraklis 1908 H
2 - 0 W
39%
Heidenheim H
1 - 1 D
49%
Bielefeld H
0 - 4 L
51%
Inter Milan H
3 - 3 D
80%
Atalanta A
1 - 0 W
72%
Napoli A
3 - 2 W
81%
Cagliari H
0 - 0 D
72%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (52.3 vs 57.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Brann outperforms Bologna with 2.2 goals per match to 1.6, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Defensively, Brann and Bologna are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.3 goals per game respectively.

Brann has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Bologna has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Bologna is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Brann has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Bologna has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Brann faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Bologna can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Brann. In practical terms, Brann would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Bologna

Bologna

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Brann

6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 14 conceded

Bologna

5W 3D 2L · 16 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or