Skip to content
Compare Brann vs Fredericia

Brann vs Fredericia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Brann vs Fredericia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Brann Brann Home Team
Fredericia Fredericia Away Team
Brann
46.1
L L L W W W D L L W

Last 10 Matches

Fredericia
40.8
W L D L D D D L W L

Performance Radar

Brann
Fredericia

Categories Won

11

Brann

2

Draw

2

Fredericia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Holm (4 goals)
J. Lindekilde (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.3

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 52.4

53.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.02

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.08

1.72

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.22

Adjusted Power Rating
46.1

Attack: 61.8, Defense: 44.1, Form: 35.3

40.8

Attack: 51.7, Defense: 37.9, Form: 20.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

4
6

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
5

76-90+'

3
Brann
Fredericia
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 61.8
Defense 44.1
Form 35.3
Consistency 39.7
Fredericia

Power Rating Breakdown

40.8

Overall

Attack 51.7
Defense 37.9
Form 20.7
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

52.4 vs 53.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Brann logo Brann
L
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (67%)
L
Aalesund (50%)
W
KFUM (39%)
W
Fredrikstad (47%)
W
Tromsø (55%)
D
Rosenborg (44%)
L
Viking (76%)
Fredericia logo Fredericia
W
Silkeborg (51%)
L
Vejle (49%)
D
Copenhagen (72%)
L
OB (50%)
D
Randers (45%)
D
Silkeborg (56%)
D
Vejle (44%)
L
OB (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sarpsborg H
1 - 2 L
42%
Bodø/Glimt A
1 - 3 L
67%
Aalesund A
1 - 2 L
50%
KFUM H
2 - 1 W
39%
Fredrikstad H
3 - 1 W
47%
Tromsø A
5 - 0 W
55%
Rosenborg A
1 - 1 D
44%
Viking A
2 - 3 L
76%
Sandefjord H
0 - 1 L
47%
HamKam A
5 - 1 W
57%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Silkeborg H
4 - 1 W
51%
Vejle A
0 - 2 L
49%
Copenhagen H
3 - 3 D
72%
OB H
0 - 2 L
50%
Randers A
2 - 2 D
45%
Silkeborg A
2 - 2 D
56%
Vejle H
2 - 2 D
44%
OB A
0 - 1 L
55%
Copenhagen A
2 - 1 W
77%
Randers H
0 - 3 L
40%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Fredericia has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 53.4) compared to Brann (SoS: 38.3). This means Fredericia's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Brann holds the attacking edge with 2.1 goals per match versus Fredericia's 1.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Brann has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Fredericia's 1.9.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Brann has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Brann

Brann

VS
Fredericia

Fredericia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Brann

4W 1D 5L · 21 goals scored · 15 conceded

Fredericia

2W 4D 4L · 15 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or