Skip to content
Compare Bristol City vs Forest

Bristol City vs Forest Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Bristol City vs Forest: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Bristol City Bristol City Home Team
Forest Forest Away Team
Bristol City
41.7
W W D L W D L L L W

Last 10 Matches

Forest
35.7
L W D W W L D L L W

Performance Radar

Bristol City
Forest

Categories Won

8

Bristol City

6

Draw

1

Forest

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Lloyd-Smith (6 goals)
J. Omewa (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.5

34.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.44

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.16

0.77

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
41.7

Attack: 45.1, Defense: 45.1, Form: 33.8

35.7

Attack: 25.3, Defense: 45.1, Form: 33.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

4
4

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

5

76-90+'

1
Bristol City
Forest
Bristol City

Power Rating Breakdown

41.7

Overall

Attack 45.1
Defense 45.1
Form 33.8
Consistency 44.8
Forest

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 25.3
Defense 45.1
Form 33.8
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

47.5 vs 47.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Bristol City logo Bristol City
W
Sheff Utd (34%)
W
Newcastle (49%)
D
Durham (48%)
L
Birmingham (52%)
W
Charlton (38%)
D
Portsmouth (31%)
L
Arsenal (62%)
L
Southampton (53%)
Forest logo Forest
L
Southampton (53%)
W
Portsmouth (31%)
D
Newcastle (54%)
W
Durham (43%)
W
Ipswich (52%)
L
Crystal Palace (70%)
D
Sunderland (43%)
L
Charlton (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sheff Utd A
4 - 0 W
34%
Newcastle H
2 - 1 W
49%
Durham A
2 - 2 D
48%
Birmingham H
0 - 1 L
52%
Charlton H
2 - 1 W
38%
Portsmouth A
2 - 2 D
31%
Arsenal A
0 - 3 L
62%
Southampton H
0 - 2 L
53%
Crystal Palace A
1 - 2 L
70%
Sunderland H
3 - 0 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Southampton H
0 - 3 L
53%
Portsmouth A
1 - 0 W
31%
Newcastle A
1 - 1 D
54%
Durham H
2 - 1 W
43%
Ipswich H
2 - 0 W
52%
Crystal Palace A
0 - 1 L
70%
Sunderland A
1 - 1 D
43%
Charlton H
0 - 2 L
38%
Birmingham A
1 - 5 L
57%
Sheff Utd H
1 - 0 W
30%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 34.6 vs 34.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Bristol City leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to Forest's 0.9 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Bristol City and Forest are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.4 goals per game respectively.

Statistical modeling projects 2.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Bristol City faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Forest can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Bristol City. In practical terms, Bristol City would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

While Bristol City holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Bristol City

Bristol City

VS
Forest

Forest

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Bristol City

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 14 conceded

Forest

4W 2D 4L · 9 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or