Skip to content
Compare Broxburn Ath. vs Bonnyrigg RA

Broxburn Ath. vs Bonnyrigg RA Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Broxburn Ath. vs Bonnyrigg RA: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Broxburn Ath. Broxburn Ath. Home Team
Bonnyrigg RA Bonnyrigg RA Away Team
Broxburn Ath.
33.6
D W W L D L D L D D

Last 10 Matches

Bonnyrigg RA
50.1
W W W L L D W D D W

Performance Radar

Broxburn Ath.
Bonnyrigg RA

Categories Won

1

Broxburn Ath.

3

Draw

11

Bonnyrigg RA

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 5D, 3L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Q. Mitchell (3 goals)
C. Ross (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.6

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.0

32.1

League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 35.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.34

1.71

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.59

Adjusted Power Rating
33.6

Attack: 45.1, Defense: 19.7, Form: 16.9

50.1

Attack: 62.9, Defense: 43.8, Form: 41.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

3
6

46-60'

6
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

4
Broxburn Ath.
Bonnyrigg RA
Broxburn Ath.

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 45.1
Defense 19.7
Form 16.9
Consistency 67.3
Bonnyrigg RA

Power Rating Breakdown

50.1

Overall

Attack 62.9
Defense 43.8
Form 41.0
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 27.0

Opponent Quality

41.0 vs 35.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Broxburn Ath. logo Broxburn Ath.
D
Dunipace (25%)
W
Cowdenbeath (39%)
W
Lochee Utd (31%)
L
Tranent (55%)
D
Bonnyrigg RA (48%)
L
Clydebank (63%)
D
Cumbernauld C. (38%)
L
Linlithgow (38%)
Bonnyrigg RA logo Bonnyrigg RA
W
Berwick (40%)
W
Annan (24%)
W
East Stirling (30%)
L
Brechin (30%)
L
Linlithgow (38%)
D
Broxburn Ath. (38%)
W
Braves (43%)
D
Berwick (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dunipace A
2 - 2 D
25%
Cowdenbeath A
2 - 0 W
39%
Lochee Utd H
3 - 0 W
31%
Tranent A
0 - 3 L
55%
Bonnyrigg RA H
2 - 2 D
48%
Clydebank A
0 - 4 L
63%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 3 D
38%
Linlithgow H
1 - 6 L
38%
Braves A
1 - 1 D
48%
Strollers H
2 - 2 D
25%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Berwick A
2 - 0 W
40%
Annan H
1 - 0 W
24%
East Stirling H
4 - 1 W
30%
Brechin H
1 - 2 L
30%
Linlithgow H
1 - 2 L
38%
Broxburn Ath. A
2 - 2 D
38%
Braves H
3 - 2 W
43%
Berwick A
2 - 2 D
40%
Celtic A
3 - 3 D
48%
Hearts H
4 - 0 W
24%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (34.6 vs 32.1), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Bonnyrigg RA outperforms Broxburn Ath. with 2.3 goals per match to 1.6, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Bonnyrigg RA holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.4 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Broxburn Ath.'s leaky backline that surrenders 2.3 goals per match.

Broxburn Ath. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bonnyrigg RA has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Broxburn Ath. is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Bonnyrigg RA has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Bonnyrigg RA is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Broxburn Ath. shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Bonnyrigg RA faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Broxburn Ath. can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 16.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Bonnyrigg RA. In practical terms, Bonnyrigg RA would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Bonnyrigg RA holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 50.1 against 33.6 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the Highland / Lowland (2026-04-11). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Broxburn Ath.

Broxburn Ath.

VS
Bonnyrigg RA

Bonnyrigg RA

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Broxburn Ath.

2W 5D 3L · 16 goals scored · 23 conceded

Bonnyrigg RA

5W 3D 2L · 23 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or