Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Burkina Faso
Home Team
Zimbabwe
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Burkina Faso
Draw
Zimbabwe
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
4W, 1D, 5L
18 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
+5
-1
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 4 matches
2W / 3 matches
2W / 6 matches
2W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 66.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3
League Difficulty: 67.5, Opponent Quality: 54.7
0W / 1 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.13
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.02
Attack: 57.2, Defense: 54.1, Form: 47.7
Attack: 38.4, Defense: 54.5, Form: 38.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Burkina Faso
Zimbabwe
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.4 vs 46.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Burkina Faso leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Zimbabwe's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe are evenly matched, allowing 1.3 and 1.3 goals per game respectively.
Burkina Faso has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
📈 Form Momentum: Burkina Faso has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Burkina Faso faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Zimbabwe can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 9.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Burkina Faso. In practical terms, Burkina Faso would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
While Burkina Faso holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 9.3-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Burkina Faso
Zimbabwe
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Burkina Faso
5W 2D 3L · 18 goals scored · 13 conceded
Zimbabwe
4W 1D 5L · 12 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams