Skip to content
Compare Caernarfon vs TNS

Caernarfon vs TNS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Caernarfon vs TNS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Caernarfon Caernarfon Home Team
TNS TNS Away Team
Caernarfon
38.4
L L W W W L L L W W

Last 10 Matches

TNS
44.6
L L L W W W L W W L

Performance Radar

Caernarfon
TNS

Categories Won

5

Caernarfon

4

Draw

6

TNS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 0D, 5L

50%

5W, 0D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

0

0

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Young (3 goals)
R. Brobbel (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.4

League Difficulty: 51.6, Opponent Quality: 53.6

44.6

League Difficulty: 58.7, Opponent Quality: 60.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.31

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.19

1.14

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
38.4

Attack: 44.7, Defense: 26.8, Form: 44.7

44.6

Attack: 37.8, Defense: 56.8, Form: 47.3

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

3

76-90+'

6
Caernarfon
TNS
Caernarfon

Power Rating Breakdown

38.4

Overall

Attack 44.7
Defense 26.8
Form 44.7
Consistency 32.5
TNS

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 37.8
Defense 56.8
Form 47.3
Consistency 32.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

51.6 vs 58.7

Opponent Quality

53.6 vs 60.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Caernarfon logo Caernarfon
L
Levadia (82%)
L
Levadia (80%)
W
Penybont (31%)
W
Flint Town Utd (45%)
W
Colwyn Bay (52%)
L
TNS (46%)
L
Barry Town (61%)
L
Connah's Quay Nomads (42%)
TNS logo TNS
L
Flora (74%)
L
Sabah (95%)
L
Sabah (97%)
W
Barry Town (61%)
W
Connah's Quay Nomads (42%)
W
Caernarfon (48%)
L
Colwyn Bay (48%)
W
Penybont (36%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Levadia A
0 - 5 L
82%
Levadia H
0 - 5 L
80%
Penybont H
2 - 0 W
31%
Flint Town Utd H
3 - 0 W
45%
Colwyn Bay A
2 - 0 W
52%
TNS H
0 - 4 L
46%
Barry Town A
1 - 2 L
61%
Connah's Quay Nomads H
2 - 4 L
42%
Y Rhyl 1879 A
2 - 1 W
49%
Colwyn Bay H
3 - 0 W
48%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Flora A
0 - 1 L
74%
Sabah H
1 - 2 L
95%
Sabah A
0 - 2 L
97%
Barry Town A
1 - 0 W
61%
Connah's Quay Nomads H
2 - 1 W
42%
Caernarfon A
4 - 0 W
48%
Colwyn Bay H
0 - 2 L
48%
Penybont A
2 - 1 W
36%
Connah's Quay Nomads A
2 - 1 W
47%
Barry Town H
0 - 2 L
56%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 39.4 vs 44.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, Caernarfon outperforms TNS with 1.5 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

TNS holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to Caernarfon's leaky backline that surrenders 2.1 goals per match.

TNS has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

TNS is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Caernarfon has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: TNS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for TNS. In practical terms, TNS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While TNS holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Cymru Premier match (2026-03-27), TNS prevailed 0-4 against Caernarfon. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, TNS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Caernarfon shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-4 scoreline was emphatic — TNS completely dominated Caernarfon in that encounter, raising serious questions about Caernarfon's ability to compete at this level. Caernarfon will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TNS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Caernarfon

Caernarfon

VS
TNS

TNS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Caernarfon

5W 0D 5L · 15 goals scored · 21 conceded

TNS

5W 0D 5L · 12 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or