Cagliari vs Pisa Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Cagliari vs Pisa: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Cagliari
Home Team
Pisa
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Cagliari
Draw
Pisa
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
1W, 1D, 8L
9 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
-3
-9
3 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
1W / 6 matches
1W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 66.8
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 61.0
0W / 3 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.27
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.11
Attack: 32.3, Defense: 64.6, Form: 43.0
Attack: 34.0, Defense: 37.4, Form: 10.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Cagliari
Pisa
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (57.6 vs 52.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Cagliari averaging 0.9 and Pisa averaging 1.0 goals per match.
Cagliari's backline outperforms Pisa's, with 1.2 goals conceded per match versus 1.9.
Cagliari has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Pisa has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
❄️ Form Momentum: Pisa is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Cagliari is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Pisa shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 79% win probability for Cagliari. In practical terms, Cagliari would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Cagliari has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.7-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Cagliari
Pisa
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Cagliari
4W 2D 4L · 9 goals scored · 12 conceded
Pisa
1W 1D 8L · 10 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams