Skip to content
Compare Cambridge U vs Barnet

Cambridge U vs Barnet Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cambridge U vs Barnet: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cambridge U Cambridge U Home Team
Barnet Barnet Away Team
Cambridge U
50.1
D W W D D W D W L D

Last 10 Matches

Barnet
59.1
W W W L D D L D W W

Performance Radar

Cambridge U
Barnet

Categories Won

3

Cambridge U

2

Draw

10

Barnet

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 5D, 1L

50%

5W, 3D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

+11

+11

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Knight (4 goals)
C. Stead (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.4

League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 45.4

46.2

League Difficulty: 43.0, Opponent Quality: 48.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.06

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.04

2.12

Actual: 2.4 | Diff: +0.28

Adjusted Power Rating
50.1

Attack: 34.6, Defense: 75.5, Form: 37.8

59.1

Attack: 77.0, Defense: 54.5, Form: 48.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

5

16-30'

4
3

31-45'

1
4

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

2

76-90+'

4
Cambridge U
Barnet
Cambridge U

Power Rating Breakdown

50.1

Overall

Attack 34.6
Defense 75.5
Form 37.8
Consistency 63.7
Barnet

Power Rating Breakdown

59.1

Overall

Attack 77.0
Defense 54.5
Form 48.1
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

43.0 vs 43.0

Opponent Quality

45.4 vs 48.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cambridge U logo Cambridge U
D
Bromley (48%)
W
Wigan (36%)
W
Barnet (56%)
D
Norwich (50%)
D
Northampton (39%)
W
Preston (39%)
D
Crewe (51%)
W
Barrow (38%)
Barnet logo Barnet
W
Shrewsbury (38%)
W
Arsenal U21 (42%)
W
Salford (46%)
L
Cambridge U (59%)
D
Bromley (43%)
D
MK Dons (41%)
L
Oxford U (54%)
D
Luton (59%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Bromley A
1 - 1 D
48%
Wigan H
3 - 2 W
36%
Barnet H
2 - 1 W
56%
Norwich A
0 - 0 D
50%
Northampton H
0 - 0 D
39%
Preston A
1 - 0 W
39%
Crewe A
0 - 0 D
51%
Barrow H
3 - 0 W
38%
Grimsby H
1 - 2 L
51%
Bromley A
0 - 0 D
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Shrewsbury A
3 - 1 W
38%
Arsenal U21 H
5 - 1 W
42%
Salford H
3 - 1 W
46%
Cambridge U A
1 - 2 L
59%
Bromley H
1 - 1 D
43%
MK Dons H
0 - 0 D
41%
Oxford U H
1 - 2 L
54%
Luton H
2 - 2 D
59%
Harrogate A
2 - 1 W
64%
Gillingham H
6 - 2 W
38%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (44.4 vs 46.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Few sides can match Barnet in front of goal. Their 2.4 average per fixture tells the story, with C. Stead driving that output personally responsible for 6 goals this campaign.

Cambridge U's backline outperforms Barnet's, with 0.6 goals conceded per match versus 1.3.

Cambridge U has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Barnet has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Barnet is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: Cambridge U has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Barnet has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Barnet faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Cambridge U can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for Barnet. In practical terms, Barnet would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Barnet has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In the English League Cup (2026-08-08), Cambridge U eliminated Barnet with a 2-1 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Cambridge U showed they can handle the pressure. Cambridge U secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Barnet will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Cambridge U will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cambridge U

Cambridge U

VS
Barnet

Barnet

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cambridge U

4W 5D 1L · 11 goals scored · 6 conceded

Barnet

5W 3D 2L · 24 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or