Skip to content
Compare Canada vs Zambia

Canada vs Zambia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Canada vs Zambia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Canada Canada Home Team
Zambia Zambia Away Team
Canada
52.5
W L W W D L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Zambia
41.5
L D W D D L L W D L

Performance Radar

Canada
Zambia

Categories Won

11

Canada

1

Draw

3

Zambia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Sonis (4 goals)
B. Banda (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
75%

3W / 4 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.0

League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 63.4

68.0

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.08

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.38

1.36

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.26

Adjusted Power Rating
52.5

Attack: 56.7, Defense: 70.0, Form: 40.0

41.5

Attack: 43.3, Defense: 47.2, Form: 23.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

3

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

6

76-90+'

Canada
Zambia
Canada

Power Rating Breakdown

52.5

Overall

Attack 56.7
Defense 70.0
Form 40.0
Consistency 39.7
Zambia

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 43.3
Defense 47.2
Form 23.6
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

69.5 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

63.4 vs 67.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Canada logo Canada
W
Costa Rica (60%)
L
Brazil (75%)
W
South Korea (57%)
W
Zambia (53%)
D
Argentina (37%)
L
United States (70%)
W
Colombia (40%)
L
Japan (82%)
Zambia logo Zambia
L
Algeria (69%)
D
Algeria (69%)
W
Zimbabwe (71%)
D
Kenya (55%)
D
South Korea (62%)
L
Brazil (75%)
L
Canada (67%)
W
Zimbabwe (71%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Costa Rica A
6 - 0 W
60%
Brazil A
0 - 1 L
75%
South Korea H
3 - 1 W
57%
Zambia H
4 - 0 W
53%
Argentina H
0 - 0 D
37%
United States A
0 - 1 L
70%
Colombia H
4 - 1 W
40%
Japan A
0 - 1 L
82%
Japan A
0 - 3 L
82%
Netherlands A
0 - 1 L
78%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Algeria A
0 - 1 L
69%
Algeria A
1 - 1 D
69%
Zimbabwe H
3 - 0 W
71%
Kenya H
1 - 1 D
55%
South Korea A
1 - 1 D
62%
Brazil A
1 - 6 L
75%
Canada A
0 - 4 L
67%
Zimbabwe H
3 - 1 W
71%
Malawi A
1 - 1 D
54%
South Africa A
0 - 2 L
79%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Zambia has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 68.0 against considerably stronger competition than Canada (SoS: 50.0). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

Canada leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to Zambia's 1.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Canada is far superior, conceding just 0.9 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Zambia leaks 1.8 goals per match.

Canada has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Zambia has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Canada has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Zambia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Canada faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Zambia can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Canada. In practical terms, Canada would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Canada, with a 11.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Internationals Women match (2026-04-11), Canada prevailed 4-0 against Zambia. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Canada secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Canada completely dominated Zambia in that encounter, raising serious questions about Zambia's ability to compete at this level. Zambia will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Canada will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Canada

Canada

VS
Zambia

Zambia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Canada

4W 1D 5L · 17 goals scored · 9 conceded

Zambia

2W 4D 4L · 11 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or