Canada vs Zambia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Canada vs Zambia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Canada
Home Team
Zambia
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Canada
Draw
Zambia
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 5L
2W, 4D, 4L
17 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
+8
-7
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3W / 4 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 6 matches
0W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 63.4
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2
0W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.38
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.26
Attack: 56.7, Defense: 70.0, Form: 40.0
Attack: 43.3, Defense: 47.2, Form: 23.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Canada
Zambia
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Zambia has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 68.0 against considerably stronger competition than Canada (SoS: 50.0). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Canada leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to Zambia's 1.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, Canada is far superior, conceding just 0.9 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Zambia leaks 1.8 goals per match.
Canada has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Zambia has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Canada has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Zambia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Canada faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Zambia can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Canada. In practical terms, Canada would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Canada, with a 11.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
In their recent Internationals Women match (2026-04-11), Canada prevailed 4-0 against Zambia. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Canada secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Canada completely dominated Zambia in that encounter, raising serious questions about Zambia's ability to compete at this level. Zambia will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Canada will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Canada
Zambia
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Canada
4W 1D 5L · 17 goals scored · 9 conceded
Zambia
2W 4D 4L · 11 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams