Skip to content
Compare Celtic vs Cumbernauld C.

Celtic vs Cumbernauld C. Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Celtic vs Cumbernauld C.: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Celtic Celtic Home Team
Cumbernauld C. Cumbernauld C. Away Team
Celtic
40.6
L D L L D L W D W D

Last 10 Matches

Cumbernauld C.
59.9
W L W W D W W L W W

Performance Radar

Celtic
Cumbernauld C.

Categories Won

2

Celtic

2

Draw

11

Cumbernauld C.

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

70%

7W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

3.1

31 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+17

+17

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Dargie (6 goals)
T. Horn (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 19
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.4

30.7

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 34.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.79

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.51

2.33

Actual: 3.1 | Diff: +0.77

Adjusted Power Rating
40.6

Attack: 65.0, Defense: 25.4, Form: 17.0

59.9

Attack: 80.7, Defense: 43.0, Form: 56.5

Goal Timing Analysis

6

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

6
6

46-60'

7
2

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

11
Celtic
Cumbernauld C.
Celtic

Power Rating Breakdown

40.6

Overall

Attack 65.0
Defense 25.4
Form 17.0
Consistency 64.0
Cumbernauld C.

Power Rating Breakdown

59.9

Overall

Attack 80.7
Defense 43.0
Form 56.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

41.4 vs 34.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Celtic logo Celtic
L
East Stirling (32%)
D
Cowdenbeath (32%)
L
Linlithgow (62%)
L
Albion (48%)
D
Bonnyrigg RA (40%)
L
Tranent (55%)
W
Strollers (26%)
D
Bo'ness Utd (30%)
Cumbernauld C. logo Cumbernauld C.
W
Stirling Unv (22%)
L
Bo'ness Utd (30%)
W
Gretna (29%)
W
Berwick (52%)
D
Broxburn Ath. (31%)
W
Strollers (31%)
W
Fairydean (32%)
L
Tranent (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
East Stirling A
2 - 3 L
32%
Cowdenbeath H
2 - 2 D
32%
Linlithgow H
1 - 3 L
62%
Albion A
2 - 3 L
48%
Bonnyrigg RA H
3 - 3 D
40%
Tranent A
1 - 3 L
55%
Strollers H
6 - 0 W
26%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 2 D
30%
Clydebank H
3 - 1 W
58%
Broxburn Ath. A
1 - 1 D
31%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Stirling Unv H
4 - 1 W
22%
Bo'ness Utd A
2 - 3 L
30%
Gretna H
3 - 1 W
29%
Berwick A
3 - 2 W
52%
Broxburn Ath. A
3 - 3 D
31%
Strollers A
5 - 0 W
31%
Fairydean A
3 - 2 W
32%
Tranent H
1 - 2 L
50%
Hearts H
3 - 0 W
24%
Albion H
4 - 0 W
44%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 34.8 vs 30.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cumbernauld C. holds the attacking edge with 3.1 goals per match versus Celtic's 2.3, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Cumbernauld C. has the defensive edge, conceding 1.4 per match compared to Celtic's 2.1.

Celtic has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cumbernauld C. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

The home advantage factor favors Cumbernauld C., who boasts a 80% home win rate. Playing in front of their fans could be the decisive factor.

Cumbernauld C. is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Cumbernauld C. emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (59.9 vs 40.6) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Celtic

Celtic

VS
Cumbernauld C.

Cumbernauld C.

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Celtic

2W 4D 4L · 23 goals scored · 21 conceded

Cumbernauld C.

7W 1D 2L · 31 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or