Skip to content
Compare Cercle Brugge vs Thun

Cercle Brugge vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cercle Brugge vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cercle Brugge Cercle Brugge Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Cercle Brugge
44.6
L L W W W D W L L D

Last 10 Matches

Thun
35.7
D L L L L W L L W W

Performance Radar

Cercle Brugge
Thun

Categories Won

11

Cercle Brugge

3

Draw

1

Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
90%

9 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
O. Diakité (4 goals)
E. Rastoder (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.3

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.6

38.6

League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.99

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.09

1.48

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
44.6

Attack: 58.5, Defense: 36.9, Form: 36.9

35.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 26.6, Form: 26.6

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

4
4

46-60'

3
4

61-75'

3
2

76-90+'

3
Cercle Brugge
Thun
Cercle Brugge

Power Rating Breakdown

44.6

Overall

Attack 58.5
Defense 36.9
Form 36.9
Consistency 44.8
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 47.3
Defense 26.6
Form 26.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.4 vs 51.0

Opponent Quality

49.6 vs 52.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cercle Brugge logo Cercle Brugge
L
La Louvière (42%)
L
ZW (54%)
W
Dender (32%)
W
Dender (37%)
W
La Louvière (49%)
D
ZW (70%)
W
Anderlecht (55%)
L
La Louvière (49%)
Thun logo Thun
D
St.Gallen (64%)
L
Young Boys (53%)
L
Sion (73%)
L
Basel (44%)
L
Lugano (58%)
W
Basel (39%)
L
Lugano (58%)
L
Zürich (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
La Louvière A
1 - 4 L
42%
ZW H
2 - 3 L
54%
Dender H
2 - 1 W
32%
Dender A
4 - 1 W
37%
La Louvière H
3 - 0 W
49%
ZW A
2 - 2 D
70%
Anderlecht A
3 - 2 W
55%
La Louvière H
1 - 3 L
49%
Sint-Truiden A
1 - 2 L
64%
Dender H
0 - 0 D
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
St.Gallen A
1 - 1 D
64%
Young Boys H
3 - 8 L
53%
Sion A
0 - 2 L
73%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
44%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
58%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
39%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
58%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
40%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
54%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 42.3 vs 38.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Cercle Brugge averaging 1.9 and Thun averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Cercle Brugge has the defensive edge, conceding 1.8 per match compared to Thun's 2.1.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Cercle Brugge has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cercle Brugge

4W 2D 4L · 19 goals scored · 18 conceded

Thun

3W 1D 6L · 16 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or