Charlton vs Blackburn Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Charlton vs Blackburn: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Charlton
Home Team
Blackburn
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Charlton
Draw
Blackburn
Statistical Comparison
2W, 2D, 6L
3W, 4D, 3L
9 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
-6
-2
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 61.0, Opponent Quality: 54.3
League Difficulty: 61.0, Opponent Quality: 58.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: -0.1
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.04
Attack: 32.1, Defense: 53.5, Form: 21.4
Attack: 25.3, Defense: 63.2, Form: 28.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Charlton
Blackburn
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.
Charlton has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 57.0 against considerably stronger competition than Blackburn (SoS: 44.8). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Charlton averaging 0.9 and Blackburn averaging 0.8 goals per match.
Blackburn's backline outperforms Charlton's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.5.
Charlton has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Blackburn is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 2.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Charlton is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Charlton's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Charlton
Blackburn
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Charlton
2W 2D 6L · 9 goals scored · 15 conceded
Blackburn
3W 4D 3L · 8 goals scored · 10 conceded
Popular Teams