Skip to content
Compare Chelmsford vs Slough

Chelmsford vs Slough Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chelmsford vs Slough: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chelmsford Chelmsford Home Team
Slough Slough Away Team
Chelmsford
41.2
L W D D D W D W L L

Last 10 Matches

Slough
26.2
W L L L D L L L D L

Performance Radar

Chelmsford
Slough

Categories Won

9

Chelmsford

3

Draw

3

Slough

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

10%

1W, 2D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

3.0

30 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Taylor (4 goals)
L. Holness (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.9

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 39.9

38.5

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 44.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.57

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.23

1.16

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.24

Adjusted Power Rating
41.2

Attack: 51.5, Defense: 37.2, Form: 25.8

26.2

Attack: 41.3, Defense: 0.0, Form: 8.8

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

3
3

46-60'

2
2

61-75'

2
7

76-90+'

6
Chelmsford
Slough
Chelmsford

Power Rating Breakdown

41.2

Overall

Attack 51.5
Defense 37.2
Form 25.8
Consistency 57.7
Slough

Power Rating Breakdown

26.2

Overall

Attack 41.3
Defense 0.0
Form 8.8
Consistency 74.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 30.0

Opponent Quality

39.9 vs 44.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chelmsford logo Chelmsford
L
Eastbourne (24%)
W
Chesham (48%)
D
Hornchurch (55%)
D
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Dag & Red (42%)
W
Enfield T (38%)
D
Totton (38%)
W
Chippenham (43%)
Slough logo Slough
W
Dag & Red (37%)
L
Enfield T (44%)
L
Torquay (48%)
L
Chesham (48%)
D
Maidenhead (43%)
L
Ebbsfleet (48%)
L
Farnborough (48%)
L
Chelmsford (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eastbourne H
1 - 3 L
24%
Chesham A
2 - 0 W
48%
Hornchurch A
3 - 3 D
55%
Maidenhead H
1 - 1 D
43%
Dag & Red A
3 - 3 D
42%
Enfield T H
3 - 0 W
38%
Totton H
1 - 1 D
38%
Chippenham A
1 - 0 W
43%
Farnborough A
2 - 4 L
48%
Dover H
1 - 2 L
20%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dag & Red H
3 - 2 W
37%
Enfield T A
2 - 5 L
44%
Torquay H
1 - 5 L
48%
Chesham A
1 - 4 L
48%
Maidenhead H
2 - 2 D
43%
Ebbsfleet A
1 - 2 L
48%
Farnborough A
0 - 2 L
48%
Chelmsford A
0 - 2 L
45%
Salisbury H
3 - 3 D
41%
Hampton & RB H
1 - 3 L
39%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 35.9 vs 38.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Chelmsford leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Slough's 1.4 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Chelmsford — 1.7 goals conceded per game and 3 clean sheets put them well ahead of Slough, who give up 3.0 goals per match at the other end.

Chelmsford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Slough has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Slough is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chelmsford faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Slough can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Chelmsford. In practical terms, Chelmsford would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Chelmsford holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 41.2 against 26.2 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-03-16), Chelmsford prevailed 2-0 against Slough. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Chelmsford secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Slough will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chelmsford will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chelmsford

Chelmsford

VS
Slough

Slough

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chelmsford

3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 17 conceded

Slough

1W 2D 7L · 14 goals scored · 30 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or