Skip to content
Compare Chesham vs Bath

Chesham vs Bath Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chesham vs Bath: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chesham Chesham Home Team
Bath Bath Away Team
Chesham
46.1
D L L W W W W L W L

Last 10 Matches

Bath
36.1
D L L W L W L W L D

Performance Radar

Chesham
Bath

Categories Won

10

Chesham

3

Draw

2

Bath

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Yearn (7 goals)
S. Wilson (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.8

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 39.7

40.6

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.61

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.59

1.4

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
46.1

Attack: 62.9, Defense: 34.3, Form: 42.9

36.1

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

3
4

31-45'

2
10

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

3
Chesham
Bath
Chesham

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 62.9
Defense 34.3
Form 42.9
Consistency 38.8
Bath

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 24.2
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

39.7 vs 45.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chesham logo Chesham
D
Dover (25%)
L
Chelmsford (40%)
L
Bath (38%)
W
Slough (21%)
W
Hemel H (45%)
W
Enfield T (38%)
W
Tonbridge (42%)
L
Hornchurch (53%)
Bath logo Bath
D
Newport (45%)
L
Plymouth (62%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
W
Dorking (39%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Chesham (43%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Chippenham (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dover A
2 - 2 D
25%
Chelmsford H
0 - 2 L
40%
Bath A
2 - 4 L
38%
Slough H
4 - 1 W
21%
Hemel H A
3 - 0 W
45%
Enfield T A
4 - 3 W
38%
Tonbridge H
1 - 0 W
42%
Hornchurch H
1 - 2 L
53%
Maidstone H
4 - 2 W
57%
Totton H
1 - 2 L
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
2 - 2 D
45%
Plymouth H
0 - 3 L
62%
Maidstone H
2 - 3 L
57%
Dorking A
3 - 1 W
39%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham H
4 - 2 W
43%
Torquay A
1 - 4 L
53%
Chippenham H
1 - 0 W
38%
Maidenhead A
0 - 3 L
48%
Eastbourne A
2 - 2 D
29%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.8 vs 40.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Chesham holds the attacking edge with 2.2 goals per match versus Bath's 1.6, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Chesham's backline outperforms Bath's, with 1.8 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.

Chesham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Chesham has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chesham faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If Bath can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 75% win probability for Chesham. In practical terms, Chesham would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Chesham holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 10.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-11), Bath prevailed 4-2 against Chesham. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Bath secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Chesham will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Bath will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chesham

Chesham

VS
Bath

Bath

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chesham

5W 1D 4L · 22 goals scored · 18 conceded

Bath

3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or