Skip to content
Compare Chester vs Spennymoor

Chester vs Spennymoor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chester vs Spennymoor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chester Chester Home Team
Spennymoor Spennymoor Away Team
Chester
48.6
W L L L D W W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Spennymoor
42.8
L L D W L L D W W W

Performance Radar

Chester
Spennymoor

Categories Won

6

Chester

2

Draw

7

Spennymoor

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 1D, 3L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Davies (2 goals)
C. McKeown (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.2

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 42.3

40.7

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.74

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.26

1.02

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.18

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 29.7, Defense: 68.4, Form: 53.5

42.8

Attack: 36.3, Defense: 57.4, Form: 36.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

Chester
Spennymoor
Chester

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 29.7
Defense 68.4
Form 53.5
Consistency 43.3
Spennymoor

Power Rating Breakdown

42.8

Overall

Attack 36.3
Defense 57.4
Form 36.3
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

34.5 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

42.3 vs 45.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chester logo Chester
W
Hyde Utd (41%)
L
Stoke (34%)
L
Fleetwood (55%)
L
Macclesfield (44%)
D
King's Lynn (35%)
W
Oxford City (58%)
W
Fylde (46%)
W
Macclesfield (44%)
Spennymoor logo Spennymoor
L
Halifax (49%)
L
Hartlepool (48%)
D
Marine (32%)
W
Macclesfield (44%)
L
Worksop (46%)
L
Scarborough (46%)
D
South Shields (42%)
W
Kidderminster (67%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hyde Utd A
1 - 0 W
41%
Stoke H
0 - 1 L
34%
Fleetwood A
0 - 2 L
55%
Macclesfield A
1 - 2 L
44%
King's Lynn H
0 - 0 D
35%
Oxford City A
2 - 1 W
58%
Fylde H
1 - 0 W
46%
Macclesfield A
2 - 0 W
44%
Telford H
2 - 1 W
34%
Curzon Ashton A
1 - 0 W
32%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Halifax H
1 - 3 L
49%
Hartlepool H
1 - 2 L
48%
Marine H
1 - 1 D
32%
Macclesfield A
2 - 0 W
44%
Worksop H
0 - 1 L
46%
Scarborough A
0 - 1 L
46%
South Shields H
1 - 1 D
42%
Kidderminster H
3 - 1 W
67%
King's Lynn A
1 - 0 W
40%
Hereford A
2 - 1 W
45%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (39.2 vs 40.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Chester (1.0 goals per match) and Spennymoor (1.2 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Defensively, Chester holds the advantage — allowing just 0.7 goals per game against Spennymoor's 1.1.

Chester has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Spennymoor has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Spennymoor is a strong road performer with a 75% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.0 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

📈 Form Momentum: Chester has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for Chester. In practical terms, Chester would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Chester, with a 5.8-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chester

Chester

VS
Spennymoor

Spennymoor

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chester

6W 1D 3L · 10 goals scored · 7 conceded

Spennymoor

4W 2D 4L · 12 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or