Skip to content
Compare Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury

Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chesterfield vs Shrewsbury: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chesterfield Chesterfield Home Team
Shrewsbury Shrewsbury Away Team
Chesterfield
45.0
W L L L D L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Shrewsbury
32.9
L L D D L D D L D D

Performance Radar

Chesterfield
Shrewsbury

Categories Won

9

Chesterfield

4

Draw

2

Shrewsbury

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

0%

0W, 6D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-8

-8

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Bonis (5 goals)
J. Davison (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.8

League Difficulty: 41.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

48.0

League Difficulty: 42.5, Opponent Quality: 51.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.88

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.12

0.55

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
45.0

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 67.8, Form: 38.7

32.9

Attack: 19.6, Defense: 52.3, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

3

31-45'

1

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

1
Chesterfield
Shrewsbury
Chesterfield

Power Rating Breakdown

45.0

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 67.8
Form 38.7
Consistency 44.8
Shrewsbury

Power Rating Breakdown

32.9

Overall

Attack 19.6
Defense 52.3
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

41.0 vs 42.5

Opponent Quality

50.7 vs 51.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chesterfield logo Chesterfield
W
Salford (51%)
L
Fleetwood (51%)
L
Fleetwood (58%)
L
Halifax (62%)
D
Notts Co (49%)
L
Notts Co (44%)
W
Swindon (39%)
W
Crewe (46%)
Shrewsbury logo Shrewsbury
L
Barnet (54%)
L
Tranmere (49%)
D
Salford (53%)
D
Hereford (61%)
L
West Brom (67%)
D
Radcliffe (39%)
D
Stafford (53%)
L
Gillingham (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Salford A
1 - 0 W
51%
Fleetwood H
0 - 1 L
51%
Fleetwood A
0 - 1 L
58%
Halifax A
2 - 3 L
62%
Notts Co A
0 - 0 D
49%
Notts Co H
0 - 1 L
44%
Swindon A
2 - 1 W
39%
Crewe H
2 - 0 W
46%
Fleetwood A
1 - 1 D
56%
Grimsby H
2 - 1 W
51%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barnet H
1 - 3 L
54%
Tranmere A
0 - 2 L
49%
Salford A
1 - 1 D
53%
Hereford A
1 - 1 D
61%
West Brom H
1 - 4 L
67%
Radcliffe A
0 - 0 D
39%
Stafford A
0 - 0 D
53%
Gillingham A
0 - 1 L
43%
Fleetwood H
2 - 2 D
51%
Crawley A
0 - 0 D
46%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.8 vs 48.0), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Chesterfield outperforms Shrewsbury with 1.0 goals per match to 0.6, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Chesterfield has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Shrewsbury's 1.4.

Chesterfield has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Shrewsbury has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 1.9 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Shrewsbury is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Chesterfield is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Shrewsbury shows signs of decline with 0W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 12.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for Chesterfield. In practical terms, Chesterfield would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Chesterfield holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 12.1-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chesterfield

Chesterfield

VS
Shrewsbury

Shrewsbury

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chesterfield

4W 2D 4L · 10 goals scored · 9 conceded

Shrewsbury

0W 6D 4L · 6 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or