Skip to content
Compare Chicago vs Columbus

Chicago vs Columbus Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chicago vs Columbus: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chicago Chicago Home Team
Columbus Columbus Away Team
Chicago
66.8
W W W L L W D W W W

Last 10 Matches

Columbus
47.7
W D L L L W W L D W

Performance Radar

Chicago
Columbus

Categories Won

12

Chicago

2

Draw

1

Columbus

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
70%

7W, 1D, 2L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+10

+10

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
H. Cuypers (10 goals)
M. Arfsten (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
75%

3W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

51.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 48.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.11

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.09

1.55

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
66.8

Attack: 74.4, Defense: 60.8, Form: 71.0

47.7

Attack: 54.0, Defense: 50.6, Form: 40.5

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

3

31-45'

2
5

46-60'

6
6

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

1
Chicago
Columbus
Chicago

Power Rating Breakdown

66.8

Overall

Attack 74.4
Defense 60.8
Form 71.0
Consistency 53.2
Columbus

Power Rating Breakdown

47.7

Overall

Attack 54.0
Defense 50.6
Form 40.5
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

49.0 vs 48.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chicago logo Chicago
W
Toronto (44%)
W
Montréal (50%)
W
DC United (51%)
L
New York (51%)
L
Cincinnati (53%)
W
Sporting KC (31%)
D
Cincinnati (58%)
W
Atlanta United (40%)
Columbus logo Columbus
W
Atlanta United (40%)
D
Philadelphia (45%)
L
New York (56%)
L
NYCFC (48%)
L
Minnesota (55%)
W
Philadelphia (40%)
W
Galaxy (52%)
L
New England (66%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Toronto H
2 - 1 W
44%
Montréal A
2 - 0 W
50%
DC United A
3 - 1 W
51%
New York H
1 - 3 L
51%
Cincinnati H
2 - 3 L
53%
Sporting KC H
5 - 0 W
31%
Cincinnati A
3 - 3 D
58%
Atlanta United H
1 - 0 W
40%
Nashville H
1 - 0 W
67%
Philadelphia A
2 - 1 W
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Atlanta United H
2 - 0 W
40%
Philadelphia A
1 - 1 D
45%
New York A
2 - 3 L
56%
NYCFC A
0 - 3 L
48%
Minnesota H
2 - 3 L
55%
Philadelphia H
2 - 0 W
40%
Galaxy H
2 - 1 W
52%
New England A
1 - 2 L
66%
Orlando H
1 - 1 D
42%
Atlanta United A
3 - 1 W
45%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.4 vs 51.3), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Chicago holds the attacking edge with 2.2 goals per match versus Columbus's 1.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Chicago has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Columbus's 1.5.

Chicago has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Columbus has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chicago is a strong road team with a 75% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Chicago emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (66.8 vs 47.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chicago

Chicago

VS
Columbus

Columbus

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chicago

7W 1D 2L · 22 goals scored · 12 conceded

Columbus

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or