Skip to content
Compare Chinese Taipei vs China

Chinese Taipei vs China Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chinese Taipei vs China: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chinese Taipei Chinese Taipei Home Team
China China Away Team
Chinese Taipei
56.7
L L W W L W W W

Last 10 Matches

China
52.9
L L W W W W W W L L

Performance Radar

Chinese Taipei
China

Categories Won

6

Chinese Taipei

2

Draw

7

China

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
62%

5W, 0D, 3L

60%

6W, 0D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

11 / 8 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

9 / 8 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
50%

4 / 8 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
38%

3 / 8 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
12%

1 / 8 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Su Yu-hsuan (2 goals)
Wang Shuang (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
50%

1W / 2 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.7

League Difficulty: 58.1, Opponent Quality: 54.1

45.5

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 58.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.04

2.19

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
56.7

Attack: 49.3, Defense: 66.9, Form: 65.5

52.9

Attack: 66.9, Defense: 41.4, Form: 57.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

3

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

5

61-75'

1

76-90+'

3
Chinese Taipei
China
Chinese Taipei

Power Rating Breakdown

56.7

Overall

Attack 49.3
Defense 66.9
Form 65.5
Consistency 36.7
China

Power Rating Breakdown

52.9

Overall

Attack 66.9
Defense 41.4
Form 57.3
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.1 vs 62.5

Opponent Quality

54.1 vs 58.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chinese Taipei logo Chinese Taipei
L
Korea DPR (55%)
L
China (56%)
W
India (31%)
W
Vietnam (33%)
L
Japan (68%)
W
Nepal (64%)
W
Indonesia (64%)
W
Philippines (62%)
China logo China
L
Football Union of Russia (72%)
L
Australia (61%)
W
Chinese Taipei (50%)
W
Korea DPR (59%)
W
Uzbekistan (44%)
W
Bangladesh (25%)
W
Vietnam (53%)
W
Vietnam (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Korea DPR H
0 - 4 L
55%
China A
0 - 2 L
56%
India A
3 - 1 W
31%
Vietnam H
1 - 0 W
33%
Japan A
0 - 2 L
68%
Nepal A
1 - 0 W
64%
Indonesia A
5 - 0 W
64%
Philippines A
1 - 0 W
62%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Football Union of Russia H
1 - 2 L
72%
Australia H
1 - 2 L
61%
Chinese Taipei H
2 - 0 W
50%
Korea DPR A
2 - 1 W
59%
Uzbekistan A
3 - 0 W
44%
Bangladesh H
2 - 0 W
25%
Vietnam H
6 - 1 W
53%
Vietnam H
2 - 0 W
53%
Scotland A
2 - 3 L
84%
England A
0 - 8 L
85%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

Context matters here: Chinese Taipei's schedule strength (SoS: 55.7) has been notably more demanding than China's (SoS: 45.5), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Offensively, China outperforms Chinese Taipei with 2.1 goals per match to 1.4, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Chinese Taipei has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to China's 1.7.

Chinese Taipei has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

China has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Chinese Taipei is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Chinese Taipei has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.88 points per game over their last 8 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: China has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.8 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: Chinese Taipei's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-14), China eliminated Chinese Taipei with a 2-0 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and China showed they can handle the pressure. China secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Chinese Taipei will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. China will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chinese Taipei

Chinese Taipei

VS
China

China

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chinese Taipei

5W 0D 3L · 11 goals scored · 9 conceded

China

6W 0D 4L · 21 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or