Skip to content
Compare Chinese Taipei vs Korea DPR

Chinese Taipei vs Korea DPR Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chinese Taipei vs Korea DPR: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chinese Taipei Chinese Taipei Home Team
Korea DPR Korea DPR Away Team
Chinese Taipei
56.7
L L W W L W W W

Last 10 Matches

Korea DPR
71.7
W L L W W D W

Performance Radar

Chinese Taipei
Korea DPR

Categories Won

3

Chinese Taipei

3

Draw

9

Korea DPR

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
62%

5W, 0D, 3L

57%

4W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

11 / 8 matches

2.9

20 / 7 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

9 / 8 matches

1.0

7 / 7 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+13

+13

Clean Sheet
50%

4 / 8 matches

43%

3 / 7 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
38%

3 / 8 matches

86%

6 / 7 matches

Both Teams to Score
12%

1 / 8 matches

57%

4 / 7 matches

Top Scorer
Su Yu-hsuan (2 goals)
Myong Yu-Jong (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
50%

1W / 2 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.7

League Difficulty: 58.1, Opponent Quality: 54.1

53.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.04

2.79

Actual: 2.9 | Diff: +0.07

Adjusted Power Rating
56.7

Attack: 49.3, Defense: 66.9, Form: 65.5

71.7

Attack: 100, Defense: 69.1, Form: 59.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

4

61-75'

4
1

76-90+'

1
Chinese Taipei
Korea DPR
Chinese Taipei

Power Rating Breakdown

56.7

Overall

Attack 49.3
Defense 66.9
Form 65.5
Consistency 36.7
Korea DPR

Power Rating Breakdown

71.7

Overall

Attack 100
Defense 69.1
Form 59.1
Consistency 44.9

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.1 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

54.1 vs 54.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
Chinese Taipei logo Chinese Taipei
L
Korea DPR (55%)
L
China (56%)
W
India (31%)
W
Vietnam (33%)
L
Japan (68%)
W
Nepal (64%)
W
Indonesia (64%)
W
Philippines (62%)
Korea DPR logo Korea DPR
W
Chinese Taipei (54%)
L
Australia (66%)
L
China (51%)
W
Bangladesh (29%)
W
Uzbekistan (39%)
D
Football Union of Russia (72%)
W
Football Union of Russia (72%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Korea DPR H
0 - 4 L
55%
China A
0 - 2 L
56%
India A
3 - 1 W
31%
Vietnam H
1 - 0 W
33%
Japan A
0 - 2 L
68%
Nepal A
1 - 0 W
64%
Indonesia A
5 - 0 W
64%
Philippines A
1 - 0 W
62%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chinese Taipei A
4 - 0 W
54%
Australia A
1 - 2 L
66%
China H
1 - 2 L
51%
Bangladesh A
5 - 0 W
29%
Uzbekistan H
3 - 0 W
39%
Football Union of Russia H
1 - 1 D
72%
Football Union of Russia H
5 - 2 W
72%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 55.7 vs 53.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Few sides can match Korea DPR in front of goal. Their 2.9 average per fixture tells the story, with Myong Yu-Jong driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.

Both defenses are comparable, with Chinese Taipei conceding 1.1 and Korea DPR conceding 1.0 per match.

Chinese Taipei has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Korea DPR is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

📈 Form Momentum: Chinese Taipei has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.88 points per game over their last 8 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Korea DPR has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.86 points per game over their last 7 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Korea DPR. In practical terms, Korea DPR would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Korea DPR holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 71.7 against 56.7 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-19), Korea DPR eliminated Chinese Taipei with a 0-4 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Korea DPR showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, Korea DPR achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Chinese Taipei shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-4 scoreline was emphatic — Korea DPR completely dominated Chinese Taipei in that encounter, raising serious questions about Chinese Taipei's ability to compete at this level. Chinese Taipei will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Korea DPR will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chinese Taipei

Chinese Taipei

VS
Korea DPR

Korea DPR

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chinese Taipei

5W 0D 3L · 11 goals scored · 9 conceded

Korea DPR

4W 1D 2L · 20 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or