Skip to content
Compare Chippenham vs Farnborough

Chippenham vs Farnborough Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Chippenham vs Farnborough: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Chippenham Chippenham Home Team
Farnborough Farnborough Away Team
Chippenham
40.4
W L L D W L L W W L

Last 10 Matches

Farnborough
46.3
L W L W W L D W W L

Performance Radar

Chippenham
Farnborough

Categories Won

2

Chippenham

3

Draw

10

Farnborough

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Chukwu (3 goals)
M. Bloomfield (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
35.1

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 37.5

35.6

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 38.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.21

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.39

1.99

Actual: 2.4 | Diff: +0.41

Adjusted Power Rating
40.4

Attack: 45.4, Defense: 42.5, Form: 34.0

46.3

Attack: 68.5, Defense: 28.5, Form: 42.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

5
5

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

7
3

76-90+'

2
Chippenham
Farnborough
Chippenham

Power Rating Breakdown

40.4

Overall

Attack 45.4
Defense 42.5
Form 34.0
Consistency 39.7
Farnborough

Power Rating Breakdown

46.3

Overall

Attack 68.5
Defense 28.5
Form 42.8
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

37.5 vs 38.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Chippenham logo Chippenham
W
Swindon (30%)
L
Horsham (38%)
L
Hornchurch (53%)
D
Hampton & RB (44%)
W
Totton (38%)
L
Bath (38%)
L
Chelmsford (40%)
W
Eastbourne (24%)
Farnborough logo Farnborough
L
Aldershot (42%)
W
Totton (43%)
L
Tonbridge (42%)
W
Dover (25%)
W
Horsham (33%)
L
Hampton & RB (44%)
D
Hornchurch (53%)
W
Chelmsford (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Swindon H
1 - 0 W
30%
Horsham A
2 - 3 L
38%
Hornchurch H
1 - 3 L
53%
Hampton & RB A
1 - 1 D
44%
Totton H
2 - 0 W
38%
Bath A
0 - 1 L
38%
Chelmsford H
0 - 1 L
40%
Eastbourne H
5 - 2 W
24%
Dover A
2 - 1 W
25%
Hemel H A
2 - 3 L
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Aldershot A
1 - 2 L
42%
Totton A
6 - 1 W
43%
Tonbridge H
1 - 6 L
42%
Dover A
3 - 1 W
25%
Horsham H
2 - 0 W
33%
Hampton & RB A
1 - 3 L
44%
Hornchurch H
2 - 2 D
53%
Chelmsford H
4 - 2 W
40%
Slough H
2 - 0 W
21%
Dag & Red H
2 - 3 L
40%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.1 vs 35.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Farnborough holds the attacking edge with 2.4 goals per match versus Chippenham's 1.6, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, Chippenham holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against Farnborough's 2.0.

Chippenham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Farnborough has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Farnborough has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Farnborough faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Chippenham can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Farnborough. In practical terms, Farnborough would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Farnborough, with a 5.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Chippenham

Chippenham

VS
Farnborough

Farnborough

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Chippenham

4W 1D 5L · 16 goals scored · 15 conceded

Farnborough

5W 1D 4L · 24 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or