Clyde vs Stirling Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Clyde vs Stirling: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Clyde
Home Team
Stirling
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Clyde
Draw
Stirling
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
2W, 3D, 5L
16 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-4
-4
2 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 42.4, Opponent Quality: 46.6
League Difficulty: 37.2, Opponent Quality: 38.1
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.18
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.22
Attack: 50.6, Defense: 31.6, Form: 38.0
Attack: 32.2, Defense: 43.9, Form: 17.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Clyde
Stirling
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 44.9 vs 37.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Offensively, Clyde outperforms Stirling with 1.6 goals per match to 1.1, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Stirling's backline outperforms Clyde's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.
Clyde has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Stirling has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Clyde has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 3.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Stirling is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Clyde faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Stirling can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 6.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Clyde. In practical terms, Clyde would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
While Clyde holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 6.1-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
In their recent Scottish League Two match (2026-04-04), Clyde prevailed 3-1 against Stirling. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Clyde secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Stirling will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Clyde will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Clyde
Stirling
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Clyde
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 20 conceded
Stirling
2W 3D 5L · 11 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams