Clydebank vs Hibernian Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Clydebank vs Hibernian: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Clydebank
Home Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Clydebank
Draw
Hibernian
Statistical Comparison
7W, 2D, 1L
0W, 0D, 1L
30 / 10 matches
0 / 1 matches
11 / 10 matches
4 / 1 matches
+19
-4
5 / 10 matches
0 / 1 matches
8 / 10 matches
1 / 1 matches
5 / 10 matches
0 / 1 matches
5W / 6 matches
0W / 0 matches
2W / 4 matches
0W / 1 matches
League Difficulty: 29.0, Opponent Quality: 40.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 71.0
0W / 0 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 3.0 | Diff: +0.51
Actual: 0.0 | Diff: 0.0
Attack: 85.8, Defense: 54.3, Form: 60.1
Attack: 0.0, Defense: 0.0, Form: 0.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Clydebank
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 35.8 vs 42.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Clydebank's attack is on another level, averaging 3.0 goals per match with N. McLaughlin leading the charge (7 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Clydebank holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.1 goals per game and recording 5 clean sheets, compared to Hibernian's leaky backline that surrenders 4.0 goals per match.
Clydebank has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Clydebank has an exceptional home record with a 83% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 4.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
🔥 Form Momentum: Clydebank is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 30 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
❄️ Form Momentum: Hibernian is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 1 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Clydebank is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Hibernian shows signs of decline with 0W in last 1.
💡 Why This Matters: The 59.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Clydebank. In practical terms, Clydebank would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Our opponent-adjusted metrics point overwhelmingly in one direction: Clydebank holds a commanding advantage here. The power rating gap — 66.9 against 7.5 — reinforces what the underlying numbers already suggest, making Clydebank a strong and justified favorite to win decisively.
In the Scottish Challenge Cup (2026-08-11), Clydebank eliminated Hibernian with a 4-0 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Clydebank showed they can handle the pressure. Clydebank secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Clydebank completely dominated Hibernian in that encounter, raising serious questions about Hibernian's ability to compete at this level. Hibernian will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Clydebank will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Clydebank
Hibernian
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Clydebank
7W 2D 1L · 30 goals scored · 11 conceded
Hibernian
0W 0D 1L · 0 goals scored · 4 conceded
Popular Teams