Skip to content
Compare Columbus vs Chicago

Columbus vs Chicago Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Columbus vs Chicago: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Columbus Columbus Home Team
Chicago Chicago Away Team
Columbus
47.7
W D L L L W W L D W

Last 10 Matches

Chicago
66.8
W W W L L W D W W W

Performance Radar

Columbus
Chicago

Categories Won

1

Columbus

2

Draw

12

Chicago

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

70%

7W, 1D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+10

+10

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Arfsten (4 goals)
H. Cuypers (10 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.3

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 48.9

51.4

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.55

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.05

2.11

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.09

Adjusted Power Rating
47.7

Attack: 54.0, Defense: 50.6, Form: 40.5

66.8

Attack: 74.4, Defense: 60.8, Form: 71.0

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3
3

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

6

46-60'

5
2

61-75'

6
1

76-90+'

4
Columbus
Chicago
Columbus

Power Rating Breakdown

47.7

Overall

Attack 54.0
Defense 50.6
Form 40.5
Consistency 44.8
Chicago

Power Rating Breakdown

66.8

Overall

Attack 74.4
Defense 60.8
Form 71.0
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

48.9 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Columbus logo Columbus
W
Atlanta United (40%)
D
Philadelphia (45%)
L
New York (56%)
L
NYCFC (48%)
L
Minnesota (55%)
W
Philadelphia (40%)
W
Galaxy (52%)
L
New England (66%)
Chicago logo Chicago
W
Toronto (44%)
W
Montréal (50%)
W
DC United (51%)
L
New York (51%)
L
Cincinnati (53%)
W
Sporting KC (31%)
D
Cincinnati (58%)
W
Atlanta United (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Atlanta United H
2 - 0 W
40%
Philadelphia A
1 - 1 D
45%
New York A
2 - 3 L
56%
NYCFC A
0 - 3 L
48%
Minnesota H
2 - 3 L
55%
Philadelphia H
2 - 0 W
40%
Galaxy H
2 - 1 W
52%
New England A
1 - 2 L
66%
Orlando H
1 - 1 D
42%
Atlanta United A
3 - 1 W
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Toronto H
2 - 1 W
44%
Montréal A
2 - 0 W
50%
DC United A
3 - 1 W
51%
New York H
1 - 3 L
51%
Cincinnati H
2 - 3 L
53%
Sporting KC H
5 - 0 W
31%
Cincinnati A
3 - 3 D
58%
Atlanta United H
1 - 0 W
40%
Nashville H
1 - 0 W
67%
Philadelphia A
2 - 1 W
45%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 51.3 vs 51.4), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Chicago holds the attacking edge with 2.2 goals per match versus Columbus's 1.6, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Chicago has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Columbus's 1.5.

Columbus has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chicago has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chicago is a strong road team with a 75% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Chicago emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (66.8 vs 47.7) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Columbus

Columbus

VS
Chicago

Chicago

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Columbus

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 15 conceded

Chicago

7W 1D 2L · 22 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or