Como vs Udinese Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Como vs Udinese: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Como
Home Team
Udinese
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Como
Draw
Udinese
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
3W, 3D, 4L
19 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
+9
+2
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
2W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 67.6
League Difficulty: 81.0, Opponent Quality: 63.0
0W / 4 matches
0W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.35
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.22
Attack: 68.3, Defense: 71.9, Form: 53.9
Attack: 41.8, Defense: 69.6, Form: 31.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Como
Udinese
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 57.9 vs 54.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Offensively, Como outperforms Udinese with 1.9 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Both defenses are comparable, with Como conceding 1.0 and Udinese conceding 1.0 per match.
Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Udinese has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.5 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Como has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 14.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Como. In practical terms, Como would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While Como holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 14.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the Italian Serie A (2026-04-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Como
Udinese
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Como
5W 2D 3L · 19 goals scored · 10 conceded
Udinese
3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 10 conceded
Popular Teams