Skip to content
Compare Cove Rangers vs QOTS

Cove Rangers vs QOTS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Cove Rangers vs QOTS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Cove Rangers Cove Rangers Home Team
QOTS QOTS Away Team
Cove Rangers
35.9
L L L W D W W L W L

Last 10 Matches

QOTS
47.5
L L W D D D W D D W

Performance Radar

Cove Rangers
QOTS

Categories Won

3

Cove Rangers

3

Draw

9

QOTS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Megginson (3 goals)
N. Clark (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
43.6

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 46.6

46.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.77

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.23

1.66

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
35.9

Attack: 31.2, Defense: 37.4, Form: 37.4

47.5

Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

5
2

76-90+'

7
Cove Rangers
QOTS
Cove Rangers

Power Rating Breakdown

35.9

Overall

Attack 31.2
Defense 37.4
Form 37.4
Consistency 39.7
QOTS

Power Rating Breakdown

47.5

Overall

Attack 57.8
Defense 48.2
Form 28.9
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

39.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.6 vs 47.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Cove Rangers logo Cove Rangers
L
Dumbarton (37%)
L
Dunfermline (54%)
L
St. Mirren (53%)
W
East Kilbride (57%)
D
East Fife (45%)
W
Kelty Hearts (46%)
W
Stenhousemuir (47%)
L
QOTS (50%)
QOTS logo QOTS
L
Queen's Park (54%)
L
Aberdeen (60%)
W
Brora Rangers (42%)
D
Kelty Hearts (45%)
D
Stenhousemuir (64%)
D
Stenhousemuir (59%)
W
Alloa Athletic (39%)
D
Montrose (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dumbarton A
0 - 2 L
37%
Dunfermline A
0 - 5 L
54%
St. Mirren H
0 - 4 L
53%
East Kilbride H
3 - 2 W
57%
East Fife H
0 - 0 D
45%
Kelty Hearts A
2 - 0 W
46%
Stenhousemuir H
2 - 0 W
47%
QOTS A
0 - 2 L
50%
Montrose A
3 - 2 W
43%
Alloa Athletic H
0 - 1 L
34%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Queen's Park A
1 - 3 L
54%
Aberdeen H
1 - 4 L
60%
Brora Rangers A
3 - 0 W
42%
Kelty Hearts H
1 - 1 D
45%
Stenhousemuir A
2 - 2 D
64%
Stenhousemuir H
1 - 1 D
59%
Alloa Athletic A
4 - 1 W
39%
Montrose H
2 - 2 D
38%
Peterhead A
1 - 1 D
37%
Cove Rangers H
2 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 43.6 vs 46.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

QOTS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Cove Rangers's 1.0 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

QOTS's backline outperforms Cove Rangers's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 1.8.

Cove Rangers has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Cove Rangers can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 79% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

QOTS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.6-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Scottish League One match (2026-04-11), QOTS prevailed 2-0 against Cove Rangers. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. QOTS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Cove Rangers will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. QOTS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Cove Rangers

Cove Rangers

VS
QOTS

QOTS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Cove Rangers

4W 1D 5L · 10 goals scored · 18 conceded

QOTS

3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or