Cowdenbeath vs Albion Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Cowdenbeath vs Albion: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Cowdenbeath
Home Team
Albion
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Cowdenbeath
Draw
Albion
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
5W, 1D, 4L
18 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
-1
+3
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
5W / 7 matches
0W / 5 matches
0W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 27.0, Opponent Quality: 35.1
League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 33.2
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.47
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: +0.6
Attack: 49.1, Defense: 30.0, Form: 24.6
Attack: 50.6, Defense: 37.3, Form: 39.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Cowdenbeath
Albion
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (31.9 vs 29.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
The attacking output of Cowdenbeath and Albion is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.8 and 1.9 goals per game respectively.
Both defenses are comparable, with Cowdenbeath conceding 1.9 and Albion conceding 1.6 per match.
Cowdenbeath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Albion has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Albion has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Albion faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Cowdenbeath can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Albion. In practical terms, Albion would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
Albion has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Cowdenbeath
Albion
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Cowdenbeath
3W 2D 5L · 18 goals scored · 19 conceded
Albion
5W 1D 4L · 19 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams